*Three Letter Acronyms

Moderator: LadyTevar
Presumably that should be a sigh of relief, rather than sight.Yitzchak heard Ben-Shoshan give a sight of relief. "Good, now we'll find out what's going on. Give him a wave as he passes overhead. Then get below and see if you can raise him on the radio."
I dunno; it seems to me that a 5 D-Cell Maglite is the moral equivalent of a ten-pound wrench. Have you ever handled one of those things? And apparently there's a 6 D-Cell version which seems like overkill to me. (link not to manufacturer website due to Norton having a freak-fit about security issues).Stuart wrote:That's the ten-pound wrench. Remember the first rule of hitting things; don't tap it, thump it.CaptainChewbacca wrote:I would've thought the FIRST strategic weapon would have been a flashlight to knock out the American attache with the launch codes to all the US missiles stationed in Britain so they could launch without our say-so.
When I first read "green" I thought that it was a simple quadrant indication system as used previously, ie for a snap report. Each of the quadrants have a colour so one can quickly infer roughly from where the threat is coming before refining the alert with a more exact bearing.Simon_Jester wrote:Hah! I knew it!
The military uses a lot of code-words, but it seems to me that when you get into the mindset, most of them are visibly related to the things they're codes for. The exceptions are mostly being used in complicated situations where people are too busy concentrating to figure out long sentences. Thus "Fox Two" instead of "I just fired a heat-seeking missile."
There's no reason to use "green" or "gray" as codes for various aircraft types.
I was SO tempted to make the B-25 a B-25H (the one with the 75mm gun in the nose). Yes, it would punch holes in the pressure hull. I resisted temptation thought, the idea of the crew being a bunch of newbies fresh out of training school was much tastier. That more or less compelled the selection of a glazed-nose aircraft.Panaka wrote:That sub can count itself lucky, bith that the B-25 is a glass nose version and that it wasn't carying anything in that bomb bay. There is a version of the B-25 with a 75mm in the nose. There's a video on the net somewhere where a flight of them is shown attacking a japanese base. They start firing at 3 miles out. Wonder if that gun could punch holes in a modern subs hull.
In the early days after The Message, anything that was flyable got taken back into service while museums worldwide were ransacked for exhibits that could be returned to flying (or sailing or drivable) condition. Even aircraft that weren't flyable found a use in testing and experimental roles 9for example, evaluating protective paint for use in Hell). Ships and armored vehicles likewise. There are Home Defense Army units with (for example) Churchills and Centurions in the UK, T-34s and a handful of KV-1s (found in a disused depot) in Russia, I'll bet a German unit somewhere has a Panther or a Tiger or two. This is, by the way, certainly doctrine in the USA; a lot of military exhibits are actually still owned by their respective armed service and, in theory at least, can be reclaimed. Mobilization plans involve them being recovered.Regarding the old warbirds getting pressed into training service. There is a B-25 in Holland somewhere and a PBY, Constellation, DC-2 and I think a DC-3 at Lelystad airport as part of a museum, all in flying condition. Would those be used for training as well?
Not bad for their era (1980s). Not up to modern standards but the Walrus's are still pretty good boats.Anyway, a somewhat of topic question that I've been wondering about since the comment about how hard it is to pick up German build subs. I was wondering about the Dutch boats in service, as I remember one got hunted for after an emergency flare was seen in its sector during a NATO excersise a few years back. It hadn't fired the flare and thought it was being hunted. It wasn't found until it surfaced at the scheduled end of the excersise. So the question for those in the know is: How quiet are the Dutch subs.
The question, for me, is how far back this goes. At some point, trying to recover museum pieces becomes more trouble than it's worth.Stuart wrote:In the early days after The Message, anything that was flyable got taken back into service while museums worldwide were ransacked for exhibits that could be returned to flying (or sailing or drivable) condition. Even aircraft that weren't flyable found a use in testing and experimental roles 9for example, evaluating protective paint for use in Hell). Ships and armored vehicles likewise. There are Home Defense Army units with (for example) Churchills and Centurions in the UK, T-34s and a handful of KV-1s (found in a disused depot) in Russia, I'll bet a German unit somewhere has a Panther or a Tiger or two. This is, by the way, certainly doctrine in the USA; a lot of military exhibits are actually still owned by their respective armed service and, in theory at least, can be reclaimed. Mobilization plans involve them being recovered.
Armaggedon will probably be published in 'dead tree' form fairly soon. I would expect Stu to make an announcement when it is ready. Pantheocide and The Lords of War (which will follow this story) will be published sometime in the future.Erra wrote:Out of idle curiosity, has Stuart thought of getting the whole series published? I think it could sell really well, and I know I'd love to have a copy. My apologies if this has been discussed before.
There are rumors that the Russians still have warehouses full of stored T-34/85s. I don't know whether that is true, or not, however what is true is that as recently as the '70s and '80s the Soviets were still supplying allies in the Third World with T-34s.Simon_Jester wrote:Thus, it seems very plausible that the Russians have enough functional or near-functional T-34s around that it's worth the effort of restoring a batch of them and using them for something- as trainers to free up more modern tanks, if nothing else. The parts will still be available (by cannibalizing the less functional ones, if nothing else).
But on the other hand, it probably does not make sense to dig the sole surviving A7V out of the Queensland Museum, since it is not particularly useful for any purpose.
As I said, I wouldn't be surprised. Granted, they have negligible resistance to modern antitank weapons, but they're still bulletproof, artillery-resistant, and they carry decent sized guns.JN1 wrote:There are rumors that the Russians still have warehouses full of stored T-34/85s. I don't know whether that is true, or not, however what is true is that as recently as the '70s and '80s the Soviets were still supplying allies in the Third World with T-34s.
That's a whole different story, though. First, because the guns were only thirty years old or so at the time. Second, because the basic Maxim gun design was very widely used throughout the world during the early 20th century, so that parts would be easier to come by. Third, because the Maxim '08 was still capable enough to be effective, compared to other, more modern machine guns. It was worth breaking them out of storage, even if they had to be rechambered in .303.On a related note to the A7V back in '42 when Australia was under threat from Japanese invasion a great many captured German Maxim machine-guns from WW1 were taken out of museums and rechambered for .303in.
I'd guess that it would depend on whether that country has enough of them to make a useful military unit. If all you have is one plane parked in a museum there's not much point in refurbishing it; it makes more sense to ship it to a country that has more in exchange for something else.Andehtron wrote:One of the things Ive liked about these stories is the old kit pressed into service and a question lurks in my mind. I live fairly close to Imperial War Museum at Duxford airfield UK, they have the American Air Museum hanger including a B-52D, F-111 a USN F4J an F-15, A-10, SR-71 and a B-29. I assume these would have been given back to the USAF, but would this be the case elsewhere? Or would the country in which the museum reside press them into service?
It's been mentioned that a version of the BAE Hawk is under production. As for the F-22, it's being built because there is a production line open for it so nothing has to be spun up, not because it's a super-fighter.w34v0r wrote: 2. Now, this I suppose is more personal, but I highly doubt the AF would crank out more F22's instead of relying on older, cheaper, models.
He was probably referring to the tendency to refer to anyone with with Sergeant in their title as "sergeant". There's no problem with that. That would be like me referring to anyone in the navy with E4-E6 as "petty Officer", even though their "Ultra proper" title would be "Petty Officer Thrid Class".3. In chapter 41 of the second book, you mention an AF Sergeant. There is no such rank, I'm afraid. There are Staff Sergeants, Tech(nical) Sergeants, Master Sergeants, and so on. Doing grunt work like that, I would assume Staff Sergeant, or even Senior Airman as possible ranks. Also, no AF member I've met has ever called an Officer anything more than their rank.
Thank you. The implications of death is a fascinating insight into post Message human society.Stuart wrote: Clearing datum, that is getting the hell out of Dodge City, after a missile launch is standard doctrine. It's done as a reflex to protect the boat. Here, the captain did it as a matter of routine without really thinking about it.
It was apparent that he hadn't checked them to see if they were alive or attempted to get them below decks. As officer on the bridge he was supposed to do both before getting himself below, not just leave them there. That's grounds for suspicion against him.
They are, but remember, being dead doesn't put people beyond reach any more. There's a military police crew waiting for them in hell to ask some pertinent questions. So, there is no driving need to question them. This is one of the things I've been trying to consider in Pantheocide, the totally changed attitude to death that's going to result. Pre-Message the principle was "don't kill him, we want to ask some questions". Now, it's "kill him, then ask we'll him some questions". This is why a suggestion that the dead should suddenly be stopped from getting reborn was unusable; it fundamentally misses the whole point of the story. The whole meaning of death has changed.
I've got some scenes set in Iraq coming up so I can move one of them to Al Asad for you. Pmail me a name and I'll gove ita cameo.w34v0r wrote: In the very beginning of the first book, you seem to completely leave out Al Asad Air Base. In 2008, it would have been swarming with Marines with a small AF squadron to run the flightline, though even most of that was still Marine run.
I would know, I was there. Still am, actually.![]()
No problem; only be careful you don't see a great black ellipse forming out there.Thanks for giving me the willies as the location of the Hellmouth is pretty much within walking distance from where I live.
They will because, at time of writing, the F-22 production line was still active and funded. The Iron Law of Mobilization is that one builds what one is already building. Expense etc doesn;t matter, what does matter is numbers and one gets them by running every existing production line at full rate. What then happens is that one simplifies the systems on those production lines at a rate and ina way so that the changes don't compromise the numbers coming off the line. So, by now, two years into the Salvation War, teh F-22s coming off the line are prohiblt E or F variants and have been simplified to miminize production time. No ECM equipment is one obvious deletion and it's a good bet that the radar absorbant material has been replaced wherever possible by less epensive and more durable materials. I'll bet they also have external hard-points to carry a lot more missiles.Now, this I suppose is more personal, but I highly doubt the AF would crank out more F22's instead of relying on older, cheaper, models.
Colloquially, they're all sergeants but I have ammended the text to read Staff Sergeant though (remember the cop talking to Franzing is a civilian; he sees the stripes and thinks "sergeant". I've been on Air Force crewed aircraft flights and they've all been pretty informal once the wheels are off the ground. First-name and nickname terms, especially between the officers. This is especially the case where crews come from a small unit and have been together for a long time.In chapter 41 of the second book, you mention an AF Sergeant. There is no such rank, I'm afraid. There are Staff Sergeants, Tech(nical) Sergeants, Master Sergeants, and so on. Doing grunt work like that, I would assume Staff Sergeant, or even Senior Airman as possible ranks. Also, no AF member I've met has ever called an Officer anything more than their rank.
You have indeed, thank you very much for the input. Pantheocide is, in many ways, the mirror image of Armageddon. Deliberately so. Lords of War is different again.Hope I helped some. I look forward to the next chapters. I really like the cat and mouse games being played out. It's more chess to the boxing of the last book.
It's coming out this year, assuming things run to schedule. Pantheocide as a book should be out early next yearYou need to publish this when you finish it. It's a masterpiece.
IMVHO they'd go back to the US, or at least serve as a source of spares, as many museum aircraft have in the UK. For example to keep a flight of four Vulcans and two Victors flying the RAF has robbed every non-flying example of spare parts. As mentioned a while back while the RAF waits in line for new Lancers they are looking at manufacturing new spare parts and what remaining Vulcans they may be able to make airworthy.Simon_Jester wrote:I'd guess that it would depend on whether that country has enough of them to make a useful military unit. If all you have is one plane parked in a museum there's not much point in refurbishing it; it makes more sense to ship it to a country that has more in exchange for something else.Andehtron wrote:One of the things Ive liked about these stories is the old kit pressed into service and a question lurks in my mind. I live fairly close to Imperial War Museum at Duxford airfield UK, they have the American Air Museum hanger including a B-52D, F-111 a USN F4J an F-15, A-10, SR-71 and a B-29. I assume these would have been given back to the USAF, but would this be the case elsewhere? Or would the country in which the museum reside press them into service?
Started off as the standard .223 M16 and M4 for the US, the AK74 for the Russians etc. These were found to be virtually ineffective; the US changed over to the .50 Beowulf M16 and M4 plus the .458 Winchester Magnum M114 and M115, teh British adopted the .338 Lapua Magnum in an enlarged and rechambered L1. Everybody else is switching over to very heavy rifle rounds fired from the appropriate rifles.Shroom Man 777 wrote:Can anyone tell me what the standard battle rifle was during the Armageddon era? Particularly when the HEA finally invaded Hell. Was it an M-16 chambered for .50 BMG or something? I forgot.