Page 4 of 4
Posted: 2007-04-05 04:46am
by VT-16
because don't many of the Saxton bashers keep insisting the "newer" material always overrides the older?
They conveniently forget the LFL statements on higher canon sources trumping lower canon sources, regardless of which came first.
Posted: 2007-04-05 10:18am
by Mange
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:Vympel wrote:The nonsensical and baseless "60 turbolasers and 60 ion claim" can, as far as I'm concerned, be admitted as part of it's "miscellaneous unseen weaponry"- given the ICS proper (ie the damn cross-section of the movie model- ie. the highest canon) identifies the various different types ov visible weaponry, there's no basis for anyone to claim that the HTLs etc do not exist.
Unfortunately, the stats for the ISD was listed as a complete rip from the WEG books....
There is no basis that the HTLs don't exists... but given the necrotic fools at Theforce.Net however..
Indeed. I know one who will be pleased... This is more evidence of the ever increasing sloppiness and general decline of SW material.
Posted: 2007-04-05 11:19am
by VT-16
Does it say that all the guns are "heavy"?