Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
From my experience in the first five minutes... yep. But I am hardly an authority on this matter.Darth Wong wrote:Fuck. The performance seems to be even worse than the last host. Should I cut my losses and move back now?
Darth Wong wrote:MySQL 3.23.55 does not support row-locking. As a result, it locks the entire database when it adds or alters a record.
What kind of idiot would design a multiuser database with a 'feature' like that?Working fine here.Darth Wong wrote:Fuck. The performance seems to be even worse than the last host. Should I cut my losses and move back now?
Actually right now it's okay.Darth Wong wrote:It seems to come and go, much like the last host.
It doesn't seem to be doing that from where I sit. The longest 'disruption' I've seen on this host since the board switch lasted less than fifteen seconds.Darth Wong wrote:It seems to come and go, much like the last host.
I agree it's actually a lot better now.Darth Wong wrote:After a rather rocky start, it seems to be chugging along fine now. Tomorrow will tell.
Yeah, load times are faster and it seems more stable.Crown wrote:I agree it's actually a lot better now.Darth Wong wrote:After a rather rocky start, it seems to be chugging along fine now. Tomorrow will tell.
So, as far as I can tell, you have it now running as a mirror to the old board and it seems to be fine. No lag, no problems posting from it. Looks good so far. Though a couple of posts were flagged as Invalid sessions, it was soon sorted and now seems fine.Darth Wong wrote:After a rather rocky start, it seems to be chugging along fine now. Tomorrow will tell.
Same here.theski wrote:I just had a 15 min window were I couldn't even load the main forums page..