Page 4 of 4
Posted: 2002-11-03 07:34pm
by CmdrWilkens
phongn wrote:CmdrWilkens wrote:
I don't think there are too many 65" monitors out there which aren't droolworthy.
Well, large screens are cool and all, but their picture is still NTSC - still nice. HDTV, on the other hand (especially from an uncompressed source)...
Yes we know, more data, no interlacing, etc. Now stop playing around and give me a funny acronym that PAL can be.
Posted: 2002-11-03 08:37pm
by Durandal
PAL = Perfection At Last. :)
Posted: 2002-11-04 10:03am
by phongn
Durandal wrote:PAL = Perfection At Last.
Not good enough.
And PAL just looks odd to me.
Posted: 2002-11-04 06:58pm
by CmdrWilkens
phongn wrote:Durandal wrote:PAL = Perfection At Last.
Not good enough.
And PAL just looks odd to me.
In what way?
Posted: 2002-11-04 09:38pm
by phongn
It's been years since I've seen a PAL signal and it's hard to put into words, but it just looked...odd.
Posted: 2002-11-04 11:16pm
by Durandal
What, it looked good?
