Knife wrote:Figured your's rated it's own post;
Thanks
The only one Leyton has given a speach to so far is Picard. As was mentioned in the last chapter, Leyton really didn't have to go out on a stump and preach the word, there were already scores of people ready to 'do something' but just needed a leader or a cause.
Yes, I understand that. However Leyton seems to have more resources than when he tried in PL.
Well, to be fair, that was before a horrible war and no one knew how bad a war with the Dominion would be, nor did they necessarily know that they were going to go to war. Leyton's coup was a preemptive thing which caused a moral dilema.
In my world, some people have seen the truth, know the Fed is broken and thus, while some acts like orbital bombardment and shit would be unethical, there is little moral problems.
General Order 24 is Orbital Bombardment, so it exists in Starfleet. Starfleet controls the only long range communications equipment in the Federation (subspace relay network), so if they wanted to, they could control information quite effectively. I believe there is evidence of this from an episode where there was a planetwide plague, but the episode name escapes me right now.
We've seen Fed ships fire on Fed ships enough that I see it happening on any capable Captain's ship. Cap'n say's fire, I fire. That's not the problem, the problem you should be asking your self is the repercussions of those actions once people get the time and perspective to think about them.
Agreed, obey orders first, ask questions later. But, when push comes to shove, like using quantum torpedoes in Paradise Lost and actually killing, there's a period for thought.
Baetson and crew are out of time, sure they've been in the 24th centuary for ~10 years, but they've grown up on Kirks Fed, not necessarily this one. One could imagine that their 'loyalty' goes as far as 'well it's the Fed, not my Fed, but the only Fed around. Better than the Klingon's' type mentality.
Fed rules would not let Bateson go back to 'his' Federation, so maybe when Leyton gave him a chance to turn 'this' Federation into something closer to Bateson's, it was enough.
That's cool, but one would think that as soon as Bateson had the chance, he would use Spock's slingshot technique to go back to his own time. Maybe that's classified information though, something that Leyton has access too, and has promised Bateson.
I thought I'd gone over that enough in the first few chapters. For all the Kum-by-ya crap the Council spews, how many brutal wars have been fought in the last 20 years? Between the Borg, the Cardassians, the Klingons and the Romulans, now the Dominion, the Federation has been through one war after another almost continuously.
The Borg was one ship that went after Earth, not a Federation-wide threat. They had the potential to be a Federation-wide threat, but ended up being pansies. I always got the impression that the Cardassians were a poor people with a really tough military. The Cardassians lost, but were able to negotiate a settlement cause of the Federation's pacifist policy. There was never any significant war with the Klingons until the Dominion War story arc in DS9, and the Romulans were isolationist and never declared war on the Federation. I'm sorry, but the idea that there were many "brutal wars" is not true.
However, I would think that one brutal war would be enough for most people to get pissed off. The only problem is that we don't see casualties on a planetary scale in the Dominion War. If the Federation has two trillion citizens, and assuming each Starfleet vessel has 1000 personnel, that is not too many casualties. And, most of the casualties would be humans, since Starfleet is mostly humans. I would see a lot of humans getting pissed off at constantly bearing the brunt of wars, while the aliens are content with using humans as meat shields in wars and want to preserve the status quo. So maybe the rebellion is mostly humans/Starfleet and Maquis.
But, instead of having a capable and standing military, they want to explore. "Doesn't any one remember when we used to be explorers?" Said Picard. In the middle of a fucking war????? I gotta believe that some in the 'quasi' military would start getting pissed off about that. How many have to die in an 'exploration' cruiser before we get some combat craft? How many redshirts have to die before we get a dedicated infantry?
Well to be fair a battlecruiser is a battlercruiser, even if it's called a fruitcake. And the Federation did make changes, like get families off ships, when the shit hit the fan in the Dominion War. Another example are of the Federation introducing a real assault rifle in the Type-IIIa's. Maybe you should illustrate how changes went too slow, or were to gradual, for the liking of the rebellion. Like, mentioning legislation in the Federation Council being held up by pacifists or something.
How many times do we have to fight the exact same mother fuckers before we bitch slap em and take away their ability to wage war? We won the war, why are we giving away planets and systems? Why are we abondoning people in those systems and when they rebel against their new masters, why are we treating them as our criminals?
This is good. There should be more Maquis element in the rebellion. The Maquis are already established canon, and we know they were supplied by sympathetic Starfleet personnel. They were wiped out by the Dominion -- but were they? Maybe some survived to continue the fight and hook up with Leyton.
Why is there a Starfleet uniform in every major commision, bussiness, institute, and organization? Why does the Council have a subcomittee on every facet of life?
Again to be fair, businesses like Sisko's dad's restaurant weren't run by Starfleet, the Federation Science Council approving research is probably akin to giving a grant rather than actually requiring their approval to do research because there's the Vulcan Science Council as well, and in Voyager we see an Arbiter who is not wearing a Starfleet Uniform IIRC when he rules on the Doctor's rights.
However, you're right, Starfleet does have an incredible amount of influence, and there is a lot of potential for abuse.
Oh, I see plenty in the Fed that would raise the ire of lots of people.
I don't disagree with this at all. The lack of a free economy should piss enough people off. I just want to see more pissed off people
The Federation has held together for pretty long. I would think the Dominion would be the straw that broke the camel's back, if you want to have an economic reason why the Federation would be going downhill. Maybe the Dominion War really stripped worlds of resources and pushed the Federation to the limit. Maybe the Federation took "extraordinary measures" in the war, for example appropriating member world's resources and conscripting citizenery or grave violations of the Federation Charter.
There are enough reasons that I don't have to make some up, I think.
No you don't, but the question is how the Federation held together with these policies for I would presume nearly half a century if not more. There should be something that is a Duke Ferdinand that caused this, maybe the Betazed debacle, maybe something else.
Let's face it, although normally unheard of, disbanding military units isn't enough to cause a rebellion. There has to be something more

. Another angle is the holoslaves like EMH Mk. I who mine dilithium, which would be direct violations of the Federation Charter's spirit, although not literally.
Brian
People with military training would be some of the first to be recruited into shit like this.
Obviously, but I was suggesting more inspiration for the rebellion, like "Free the holoslaves" or something along those lines.
Brian