StarDestroyer.Net BBS

I think it's the big difference in style within the photo, where the top half looks 'normal' and the bottom half looks almost graphical. When I look at it, my eyes go from the top to the bottom and back as if I'm looking at two photos in sequence. If I were able to reconcile the two halves then it would work just fine. I didn't mean to say Pulp Hero somehow botched the shot, if that's how it sounded.

And now for something completely different from my usual pictures.

J wrote:And now for something completely different from my usual pictures.

Something feels slightly off with that picture - the bottom portion is fairly 'flat' in addition to being dark while the top undulates and catches my eye. Viewing from an unfocused distance (aka take off glasses) the bottom is just sort of empty negative space.

More in the vein of the Sting photo:


First an ultra close up of Sting. Its blurry as hell, but I love his expression.



Opera singer. This is unfortunately, the least blurry picture.

Playing with hues:
f

f-1

f-2

And if you don't like this, you can all go to HELL

Very good colour scheme - all warm and brown. It's not very compelling, but as a portrait of Bruce it's nice (and as I said, the colours work well).

Meow!:
IMG_0243

The upper left corner also holds cat ears. I should have got a bit closer I think, but it came out rather nicely for a casual snap.
IMG_0187

Not JUST Black and white . (Taken on the dormitory rooftop)

Dummers on the Magnificent Mile


Back in the Cultural Center


In the ghetto

Two photos of mine that got published in the newspaper and the website of yNews local:



It's fun to get an easy to do idea with something you see .

Early morning


Key to the city:


Playing around with duotone looks:

WOOF

Nice framing and tilt.

Since I installed Windows 7, I've lost photoshop and not bothered to find it again. So here's my two favourite xmas morning images direct from the camera, albeit a bit shrunk by flickr.

Entranceway of the Toronto Necropolis

IMG_0086

IMG_0092-2

IMG_0051-2

"Money Money Money Money Money"



Yes there's a reason for the name, and it has to do with five of the buildings in the photo.

Two shots from a collectible cars show:


Filmy grain
h[img]ttp://farm5.static.flickr.com/4048/4237332904_17ba16d0d1.jpg[/img]

The photo of the Dodge has what the photo of the 'Stang needs: a depth of field wide enough to get the whole badge in focus.

Simplicius wrote:The photo of the Dodge has what the photo of the 'Stang needs: a depth of field wide enough to get the whole badge in focus.

I'm more upset with the unimaginative angle. But straight on shots of cars just don't work for me (not even fender/grill shots).
I guess I just can't get excited enough about cars, I guess some things are best left to Americans .


Funny little picture in the dorms.

Old thread closed.