Page 32 of 53
Posted: 2004-04-12 08:33pm
by aerius
RedImperator wrote:They're called breasts, and they're the most wonderful things on Earth.
Yeah, until you almost get an eye taken out by a nipple (see BotM for details), but I still love them. I don't know what I'd do if women didn't have breasts.
Posted: 2004-04-12 08:36pm
by RedImperator
Freud was totally full of shit, so I'm not worried about that.
Here's the thing I can't get my brain around: setting aside everything else, guys have ball sacks where women have vaginas. Why would anyone, male or female, intentionally chose a wrinkled, hairy, sweaty ball sack over a vagina? To me, ball sacks are proof that sexuality is hardwired, not chosen like the fundies claim, because nobody in his right mind would chose a ball sack.
Posted: 2004-04-12 08:38pm
by Ghost Rider
For me it comes down to this
Women look better.
I'm sorry, most guys are truly akin to a small ape versus a good many women.
Besides with Lesbians you have twice the breast and twice the pussy and no dick in sight...and then there's the fantasy angle of being sandwiched between them.
Posted: 2004-04-12 08:42pm
by haas mark
Ghost Rider wrote:For me it comes down to this
Women look better.
I'm sorry, most guys are truly akin to a small ape versus a good many women.
Besides with Lesbians you have twice the breast and twice the pussy and no dick in sight...and then there's the fantasy angle of being sandwiched between them.
Provided, of course, a pair of lesbians (the operative word being 'lesbians') would actually sandwich a male in between them...
Posted: 2004-04-12 08:45pm
by Durandal
A woman's figure is ergonomically pleasing. It's nicely curved with no rough edges. Everything looks like it was delicately sculpted. And breasts are just all around fun to boot.
A man's figure is lumpy and crappy. It's a few bulges with a completely out-of-place protrusion between the legs and a nasty little sack at the base. It's quite simple, really. Women were designed by Apple Computer, and men were designed by eMachines.
Posted: 2004-04-12 09:00pm
by Alyrium Denryle
RedImperator wrote:Freud was totally full of shit, so I'm not worried about that.
Here's the thing I can't get my brain around: setting aside everything else, guys have ball sacks where women have vaginas. Why would anyone, male or female, intentionally chose a wrinkled, hairy, sweaty ball sack over a vagina? To me, ball sacks are proof that sexuality is hardwired, not chosen like the fundies claim, because nobody in his right mind would chose a ball sack.
THAT I can agree with.
And yes, I know Freud was full of shit. But still funny as all hell.
It's a few bulges with a completely out-of-place protrusion between the legs and a nasty little sack at the base.
For some odd reason those bulges are absolutly beautiful... dont know why.
Posted: 2004-04-12 09:05pm
by Frank Hipper
Durandal wrote:A woman's figure is ergonomically pleasing. It's nicely curved with no rough edges. Everything looks like it was delicately sculpted. And breasts are just all around fun to boot.
A man's figure is lumpy and crappy. It's a few bulges with a completely out-of-place protrusion between the legs and a nasty little sack at the base. It's quite simple, really. Women were designed by Apple Computer, and men were designed by eMachines.
Those are the identical ideas I have on women's bodies, except their bizarre and unpleasant sacks hang from their chests.
Posted: 2004-04-12 09:08pm
by haas mark
Frank Hipper wrote:Durandal wrote:A woman's figure is ergonomically pleasing. It's nicely curved with no rough edges. Everything looks like it was delicately sculpted. And breasts are just all around fun to boot.
A man's figure is lumpy and crappy. It's a few bulges with a completely out-of-place protrusion between the legs and a nasty little sack at the base. It's quite simple, really. Women were designed by Apple Computer, and men were designed by eMachines.
Those are the identical ideas I have on women's bodies, except their bizarre and unpleasant sacks hang from their chests.
Not to mention, there are two of them. And they bleed from between their legs, besides.
Of course, I've hit my bi swing again, and it doesn't seem to want to go away.. I'm just really horny lately.. like you all needed to know that.. you did... HA!

Posted: 2004-04-12 09:08pm
by Captain Cyran
Crimson, you've started a full like... 2 pages, just for posting your pictures. You should be proud of that little fact. Oh, and I think you're cute, like most of the members seem to think.
Posted: 2004-04-12 09:09pm
by The Kernel
Frank Hipper wrote:Those are the identical ideas I have on women's bodies, except their bizarre and unpleasant sacks hang from their chests.
Frank I think you need to experience the joy of a titty fuck before you dismiss boobs entirely.
Posted: 2004-04-12 09:44pm
by Ghost Rider
verilon wrote:Ghost Rider wrote:For me it comes down to this
Women look better.
I'm sorry, most guys are truly akin to a small ape versus a good many women.
Besides with Lesbians you have twice the breast and twice the pussy and no dick in sight...and then there's the fantasy angle of being sandwiched between them.
Provided, of course, a pair of lesbians (the operative word being 'lesbians') would actually sandwich a male in between them...
That's why it's a fantasy

.
Posted: 2004-04-12 09:45pm
by Frank Hipper
The Kernel wrote:Frank Hipper wrote:Those are the identical ideas I have on women's bodies, except their bizarre and unpleasant sacks hang from their chests.
Frank I think you need to experience the joy of a titty fuck before you dismiss boobs entirely.
I had quite a few sexual exploits of extremely varied nature in my teen years, believe me.
When you've got to close your eyes and pretend you're in the sack with a guy when you're with the hottest girl in school, you know to just give up all pretense!

Posted: 2004-04-12 09:47pm
by Zaia
verilon wrote:Of course, I've hit my bi swing again, and it doesn't seem to want to go away.. I'm just really horny lately.. like you all needed to know that.. you did... HA!

Debi and I are pleased you shared that information, thankyouverymuch.

Posted: 2004-04-13 12:23am
by Connor MacLeod
Durandal wrote:
My divine visage is an exception to the rule.
Ah, there's the Damien we know. Where were you hiding?
Posted: 2004-04-13 12:25am
by Connor MacLeod
Dalton wrote:
Shut up, bitch! Rickslap you into next week...
As I was saying... and why are you slapping your monitor? Run out of ritalin?
Connor MacLeod wrote:
*nodnod* Yeah, real believable, that

About as believable as your Rick James impression. *snicker*
Posted: 2004-04-13 01:47am
by Exmoor Cat
Ghost Rider wrote:Connor MacLeod wrote:Ghost Rider wrote:
I didn't....oh you want to whip her.
Okay, tease.

And you don't want to?

Quiet...I'm merely two parts away from my mind contro...Spam removal device.
DOI! Join the queue and wait your turn! THat frame is becomning a complete social magnet these days.....
Posted: 2004-04-13 01:58am
by Zaia
Exmoor Cat wrote:DOI! Join the queue and wait your turn! THat frame is becomning a complete social magnet these days.....
I think I know who you are...

Posted: 2004-04-13 02:11am
by Dorsk 81
Zaia wrote:Exmoor Cat wrote:DOI! Join the queue and wait your turn! THat frame is becomning a complete social magnet these days.....
I think I know who you are...

As do I, infact, I've met him!

Posted: 2004-04-13 02:19am
by Zaia
Dorsk 81 wrote:As do I, infact, I've met him!

I know, I actually was
sure I knew who he was. I just didn't want to be rude since we hadn't been formally introduced.

Posted: 2004-04-13 04:49am
by Daltonator
Connor MacLeod wrote:Dalton wrote:
Shut up, bitch! Rickslap you into next week...
As I was saying... and why are you slapping your monitor? Run out of ritalin?

Silence, fool.
Connor MacLeod wrote:Dalton wrote:
*nodnod* Yeah, real believable, that

About as believable as your Rick James impression. *snicker*
I'm Rick James, bitch! It's a celebration, bitch!
Posted: 2004-04-13 04:50am
by Daltonator
Zaia wrote:Dorsk 81 wrote:As do I, infact, I've met him!

I know, I actually was
sure I knew who he was. I just didn't want to be rude since we hadn't been formally introduced.

I take full responsibility for letting him loose in here.
Posted: 2004-04-13 05:01pm
by InnerBrat
1) I accept some of that responsibility. I vouched for him.
2) It's quite simple, guys. Hairy chests to rest our heads on, strong arms to support our necks and versatile wrists to open jam jars.
Yes some women have those traits as well, but even girls have some macho pride, and we'd rather let the men prance about being manly then have our macho pride trodden on by a butch woman.
3) Breasts, godsdammit, Aly! BREASTS! The most beautiful thing in the world!
I thought even gay men could appreciate the wondrousness that are breasts.... You certainly must have issues with your mother
4) I'm laughing at all mods who are currently thinking "must... split... thread... why... won't... it... load...."
We should have a separate comments thread.
Posted: 2004-04-13 05:08pm
by Ghost Rider
InnerBrat wrote:
4) I'm laughing at all mods who are currently thinking "must... split... thread... why... won't... it... load...."
We should have a separate comments thread.
I would've long ago thought so, if this wasn't the funnest batch of semi off topic stuff this forum has had in a long time.
Later, I'll make a new one.
Posted: 2004-04-13 05:08pm
by Dahak
RedImperator wrote:Alyrium Denryle wrote:Well I know full well what I see in males
Hell, I dont know what you see in females. They have these two blobs of fat that just dont.. fit....
They're called breasts, and they're the most wonderful things on Earth.
ewwwwww
*shudder*
Now that I think of it...
No...
*shudder*
I prefer manly man. They're sexay

Posted: 2004-04-13 05:15pm
by Amphibious
There's me alright...
it was the best pic I had of me IMO, and was taken in December of 2003. I may not look it in that pic, but I'm in grade 10.
-Regards