Page 34 of 39
Posted: 2008-01-07 04:17pm
by Elfdart
Gates is 50/50 on playing next week, which is bad news but not nearly as bad as I thought last night.
Turner made the conscious decision to wean Rivers off of Tomlinson and Gates and it certainly paid off yesterday. The Titans shut down the two main offensive players and still lost by double digits. Finally the Chargers can make defenses pay when they stack the line and double the TE.
Posted: 2008-01-07 04:38pm
by Metatwaddle
Elfdart wrote:Schuyler Colfax wrote:Elfdart wrote:This weekend's winners:
Jaguars
Buccaneers
Redskins
Chargers
Didn't the Giants beat the Buccaneers?
Screw the NFC!

And the Redskins lost to the Seahawks. You might want to check twice before posting these things, Elfdart.

Posted: 2008-01-07 08:52pm
by Elfdart
I knew the results. That's why that conference blows.

Posted: 2008-01-09 12:09am
by Master of Ossus
Well, the
Niners hired Mike Martz for their offensive coordinator.
Posted: 2008-01-09 01:05am
by Darth Fanboy
You beat me to it MoO. It's the first Niner related bright spot i've seen since the day before we played Pittsburgh (yeah I know it was week 3....)
Posted: 2008-01-09 01:43am
by Elfdart
Darth Fanboy wrote:You beat me to it MoO. It's the first Niner related bright spot i've seen since the day before we played Pittsburgh (yeah I know it was week 3....)
Good choice for the Niners. Quarterback and wideout should no longer be liabilities next season. Now all they need to do is shore up their O-line and they should at least make the wild card round next year. Especially if Mike Holmgren retires in Seattle.
Posted: 2008-01-09 02:00am
by Havok
Elfdart wrote:Darth Fanboy wrote:You beat me to it MoO. It's the first Niner related bright spot i've seen since the day before we played Pittsburgh (yeah I know it was week 3....)
Good choice for the Niners. Quarterback and wideout should no longer be liabilities next season. Now all they need to do is shore up their O-line and they should at least make the wild card round next year. Especially if Mike Holmgren retires in Seattle.
Well, they should probably get some wideouts first.
Posted: 2008-01-09 11:16am
by Elfdart
Receivers who can get open and catch are a dime a dozen. O-linemen who can hold their blocks are not.
Posted: 2008-01-11 01:50pm
by Elfdart
I'm going to be out of town, so I'd better get my picks in now:
Chargers
Patriots
Cowboys
Seahawks
Posted: 2008-01-12 12:40am
by Medic
Elfdart wrote:I'm going to be out of town, so I'd better get my picks in now:
Chargers
Patriots
Cowboys
Seahawks
Hawks and boys? Fuck that noise.
I wouldn't pick anyone over Green Bay @ home even if hell (or Iraq) froze over. Yes, Michael Vick and the Falcons 2 or 3 years ago -- whatever, I still refuse to.
Also, the Giants are hot and the Cowboys are NOT. That may sound simplistic but G-men at least showed they can hang with the Patriots and that's impressive in it's own right. They're a good road team as it's so often noted but I'd pick them just based off their potential to hange with a 16-0 football team.
As for the Pats and Jaguars, I could come up with a list of reasons why it just doesn't seem like Jacksonville stacks up but ... I can't pick the Patriots. I hate them and their fans are
worse than those gnats that fly up your fucking nose, worse I tell you. Someone has to humble the Patriots and let it be sooner than later.
Finally, though I have reservations about the Chargers game -- Indy's a LOT healthier this time around -- neither are we the same team as that matchup, mentally at least. Back then we were suffering from a severe case of the funky funky bugaloo or
something. The offense was there one game and gone the next and we set a new bar for bad run defense. Whatever else happened between Indy and San Diego last November or in 2005, this game will be something else entirely I think. I like the way we match up physically though, especially our offense and their defense, size (though we're not SLOW at all) versus speed. On the other side of the ball we just gotta get Manning moving and guessing and bump those receivers on the line, in the air, at the point of contact and hell after the play. Basically, don't let them run their routes and make their grabs unmolested. In a cliche: impose our will on them.
If it's a track meet, it probably won't go good for us but OTOH, we can be just as explosive as them. I really hope if Gates is absent that we work Nanee and Sproles into a few plays, they both aren't names the D will que up on automatically and especially Sproles has got a spark to him. Give him 2 seconds and a lane and he'll grab 10+ yards.
Posted: 2008-01-12 02:04pm
by Qwerty 42
the CHFF predictions:
Seattle at Green Bay
New York Giants at Dallas
Jacksonville at New England
San Diego at Indianapolis
And my calls:
Seattle at Green Bay
New York Giants at Dallas
Jacksonville at New England
San Diego at Indianapolis
Posted: 2008-01-12 02:42pm
by Havok
Packers in a cake walk.
Dallas at home in a tough game.
Jacksonville ends the dream and the 72ers shoot their loads.
Indy in a vengeance fueled blowout.
Posted: 2008-01-12 07:50pm
by Patrick Degan
Who caught today's Blizzard Bowl? That was classic.
Posted: 2008-01-12 09:41pm
by Medic
Patrick Degan wrote:Who caught today's Blizzard Bowl? That was classic.
Ryan Grant especially. Dude fumbles twice early and all but gives 14 points to the other team then comes back to rush for 200 and run in 3 scores. Amazing.

Posted: 2008-01-13 02:28pm
by Medic
That penalty's the biggest ripoff in the 21st century.
HOLDING. Are you serious?! Fuck these refs!

Posted: 2008-01-13 02:38pm
by KhyronTheBackstabber
It was holding. He had him by the shoulder pads. I was yelling at the TV for the ref to call it while it was happening.
Posted: 2008-01-13 03:28pm
by Medic
They're just calling it tight, you're telling me that was a pass interference against Clinton Hart #42? The fucktard stubmled and was 5 yards shy when there was contact.
Posted: 2008-01-13 03:35pm
by KhyronTheBackstabber
SPC Brungardt wrote:They're just calling it tight, you're telling me that was a pass interference against Clinton Hart #42? The fucktard stubmled and was 5 yards shy when there was contact.
You're talking the one before the Colts got the 15 yard penalty? Yeah, that was a bad call.
Posted: 2008-01-13 03:43pm
by Medic
KhyronTheBackstabber wrote:SPC Brungardt wrote:They're just calling it tight, you're telling me that was a pass interference against Clinton Hart #42? The fucktard stubmled and was 5 yards shy when there was contact.
You're talking the one before the Colts got the 15 yard penalty? Yeah, that was a bad call.
And they called a penalty just after THAT 15 yard play. They're really just doing bad and it's affecting both teams atm.
Posted: 2008-01-13 04:00pm
by KhyronTheBackstabber
SPC Brungardt wrote:And they called a penalty just after THAT 15 yard play. They're really just doing bad and it's affecting both teams atm.
I hear that.
What I want to know is where the hell my defense is.
Posted: 2008-01-13 04:17pm
by FSTargetDrone
Chargers win over the Colts, 28-24 in a crusher.
Posted: 2008-01-13 04:19pm
by KhyronTheBackstabber
Son of a bitch.
Well congrats Brungardt. I'll be cheering you guys on next week.
Posted: 2008-01-13 04:25pm
by Medic
Hehe, thank you KTB, you beat me to it:
ALRIGHT PATRIOTS HATERS, JUMP ON THE BANDWAGON!

Posted: 2008-01-13 04:29pm
by Medic
KhyronTheBackstabber wrote:SPC Brungardt wrote:And they called a penalty just after THAT 15 yard play. They're really just doing bad and it's affecting both teams atm.
I hear that.
What I want to know is where the hell my defense is.
One reason I thought all the pre-game commentators were on crack (the CBS pre-game guys, Bill Cowher, Phil Simms, Shannon Sharpe and Dan Marino) was all of them picked the Colts with over 30 points and the Chargers under 20.
If you ACTUALLY SAW the mid-season Chargers Colts game, you'd realize that the Chargers offense was AWOL in that game and not a factor and that since then, it's been very much a new team.
I KNOW my team though and thank god the coaching staff implemented my suggestion: both Sproles (screen pass for touchdown) and Nanee (screen pass for a huge 1st down on IIRC, the final go ahead touchdown drive) were worked into the game plan and Michael Turner once again showed everyone living OUTSIDE of San Diego why he's the biggest kept secret in the NFL. He could start for most teams, he just happens to back up LT. If anything he can be more dangerous since LT's just an 8-man-front-lightning-rod.
edit: *LT's only the
best running back on the team, not the only good one. Check out Darren Sproles against the Lions in the 2nd half for other examples of his insanely quick feet*
Posted: 2008-01-13 05:21pm
by KhyronTheBackstabber
SPC Brungardt wrote:One reason I thought all the pre-game commentators were on crack (the CBS pre-game guys, Bill Cowher, Phil Simms, Shannon Sharpe and Dan Marino) was all of them picked the Colts with over 30 points and the Chargers under 20.
I didn't think there was going to be that big a spread. The score was pretty much what I thought it would be, just the other way around though.
If you ACTUALLY SAW the mid-season Chargers Colts game, you'd realize that the Chargers offense was AWOL in that game and not a factor and that since then, it's been very much a new team.
To be fair, the Colts were depleted for that game too. Marvin was out, Clark was out and a number of others too. I think we had something like 6-8 starters out to begin with. Then during the game we lost a few. Hell, we had to move a guard over to tackle because we ran out. But we put some of your guys out as well, and thats why I have the same respect for the Chargers that I have for the Jags. You know when our two teams meet up it's going to be a war.