Page 36 of 50

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-09 10:17pm
by Steve
*nod* Cool.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-09 11:52pm
by CmdrWilkens
So Shep what happened to your nation being so rabidly anti-communist that they would attack Mexican shipping for going to war with Portugal?

Also for the record:
A) The Nicaraguan Canal doesn't exist yet, it won't exist until 1932 at the earliest
B) Everybody was fine with the situation from 1914-ish to 1925 where only one nation controlled a transcontinental canal but suddenly Mexican control versus Colombian control is a cause for sending armies out?
C) The war has been going on for 11 days...just chartering shipping to move armies would probably take that long. Hell the volunteer planes aren't even going to be in action until D+12 at the earliest and their support base is much smaller than an Army

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 12:04am
by Steve
Good question. Though he seems to be getting around the "Anti-Communist" bit by claiming he's doing it with Cisplatina, not Brazil, and apparently plans for said army to overthrow the Colombian government too..... :?

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 01:35am
by CmdrWilkens
Steve wrote:Good question. Though he seems to be getting around the "Anti-Communist" bit by claiming he's doing it with Cisplatina, not Brazil, and apparently plans for said army to overthrow the Colombian government too..... :?
Yes but that is no more of a distance to tread than when I was gonna be attacked for attacking someone who was attacking communists. Unless Cisplatina actually invades Colombia (and there are a long list of reasons why that is ridiculous) this could only be used against Mexico which means FOR Colombia (and thus aiding the evil communists). In other words my spies must now diligently uncover this plot so that Shep's government will be overthrown.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 02:00am
by Ryan Thunder
CmdrWilkens wrote:In other words my spies must now diligently uncover this plot so that Shep's government will be overthrown.
Oh, well, if that's the case, then the Department of Ungentlemanly Warfare should be blowing up ammunition ships in your harbours any time now. :P

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 03:53am
by MKSheppard
CmdrWilkens wrote:So Shep what happened to your nation being so rabidly anti-communist that they would attack Mexican shipping for going to war with Portugal?
For the record I don't give a damn about points A and B.
The war has been going on for 11 days...just chartering shipping to move armies would probably take that long. Hell the volunteer planes aren't even going to be in action until D+12 at the earliest and their support base is much smaller than an Army
You forget that these guys were enshipped for an entirely different action -- supporting the Manchurians. I'm just changing their sailing orders.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 04:00am
by Steve
Still presumes they get there in time for the battles, that their purpose remains unknown to any power that would not want to see Shepistan gain the Canal, and that the Colombians themselves accept it, because the idea of you pulling off an amphibious op with those distances involved makes me laugh.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 04:05am
by MKSheppard
Steve wrote:Still presumes they get there in time for the battles, that their purpose remains unknown to any power that would not want to see Shepistan gain the Canal, and that the Colombians themselves accept it, because the idea of you pulling off an amphibious op with those distances involved makes me laugh.
There's no amphibious op involved. We sail into a random Gran Colombian atlantic port; and use the port's heavy cargo winches and cranes and other fun things to unload. We then use trains (MAGIC, I know); to move to our attacking positions in the Ithsmus of Panama.

By the time the troops arrive in Gran Columbia and have completed unloading, I'd have to say that the traffic bottleneck caused by Ryan feeding all his troops into Panama has eased up a bit, allowing me to slowly feed in units of my armies into Panama a bit at a time.

I expect them to be in position by like D+50 to D+90.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 04:14am
by Steve
You're assuming Ryan will let the troops of a violently anti-Socialist state, one that just months ago proclaimed it would rigorously search all his ships that entered adjoining sea zones, enter his country, especially since he already knows you intend to try and overthrow his government. Moreover, you're presuming the Brazilian Navy lets you do this.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 08:32am
by Lascaris
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:
Lascaris wrote:Why exactly should aircraft be downgraded to Risk levels given the detail going into frex ships?
Because some of us truly don't give a shit?
Shall we make the ships then standardized models like BB1925, BB1920 and so on with fixed size and capacity of course? By the same logic you don't give a shit for aircraft why should someone give a shit for the ships? :P

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 08:47am
by Lascaris
CmdrWilkens wrote:So Shep what happened to your nation being so rabidly anti-communist that they would attack Mexican shipping for going to war with Portugal?

Also for the record:
A) The Nicaraguan Canal doesn't exist yet, it won't exist until 1932 at the earliest
B) Everybody was fine with the situation from 1914-ish to 1925 where only one nation controlled a transcontinental canal but suddenly Mexican control versus Colombian control is a cause for sending armies out?
C) The war has been going on for 11 days...just chartering shipping to move armies would probably take that long. Hell the volunteer planes aren't even going to be in action until D+12 at the earliest and their support base is much smaller than an Army
Speaking for Cisplatina alone regarding A and B there is the minor difference that the Gran Colombians built themselves their toy to play with. Mexico is invading to steal it away from them without even any serious pretext. So no an aggressive Mexico taking over control of the Panama canal and then controlling both Atlantic-Pacific canals does not appear to be in our geopolitical interests.

Hence my version of the Condor Legion and selling arms to Gran Colombia. Though profit certainly plays a huge role for the second. :mrgreen:

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 08:49am
by Lascaris
Steve wrote:You're assuming Ryan will let the troops of a violently anti-Socialist state, one that just months ago proclaimed it would rigorously search all his ships that entered adjoining sea zones, enter his country, especially since he already knows you intend to try and overthrow his government. Moreover, you're presuming the Brazilian Navy lets you do this.
That's up to Gran Colombia and Brazil I'd think. My diplomatic services just pass the mail around. :angelic:

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 08:59am
by Norseman
Lascaris wrote:
Steve wrote:You're assuming Ryan will let the troops of a violently anti-Socialist state, one that just months ago proclaimed it would rigorously search all his ships that entered adjoining sea zones, enter his country, especially since he already knows you intend to try and overthrow his government. Moreover, you're presuming the Brazilian Navy lets you do this.
That's up to Gran Colombia and Brazil I'd think. My diplomatic services just pass the mail around. :angelic:
Actually there isn't much I could do to stop the Shepistani ships if they come across the Pacific, after all I'm pretty much a one ocean navy. That said we'll see...

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:11am
by Thanas
Alright, asked Beowulf for his terms for a peace treaty. He apparently wants the Soviet Union to surrender unconditionally. I guess this will mean the war will drag on forever unless another power jumps in.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:21am
by loomer
Don't worry, I'm sure the tides will be turned when the freshly conquered Shepistan sends its reconstructed army into Manchuria!

Actually, Shep, that covert action got detected when Steve did the rolls - mind if I take limited control of your forces for a post of a small firefight there with my troops as the definite losers?

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:22am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Thanas wrote:Alright, asked Beowulf for his terms for a peace treaty. He apparently wants the Soviet Union to surrender unconditionally. I guess this will mean the war will drag on forever unless another power jumps in.

Me: Haha.
Shady: Haha.
*Drinks Vodka*

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:33am
by Steve
What were his terms, out of curiosity?

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:37am
by Thanas
He demanded the complete and unconditional surrender of the Soviet Union. That was the only thing he wrote.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:39am
by Ryan Thunder
Thanas wrote:He demanded the complete and unconditional surrender of the Soviet Union. That was the only thing he wrote.
Oh well, he's an imbecile. But that's nothing we didn't know already. :P

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:41am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Thanas wrote:He demanded the complete and unconditional surrender of the Soviet Union. That was the only thing he wrote.
"Nuts!"

:lol:

I mean seriously, if he wants a bigger fight, he can bring it on. :lol:

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:42am
by Norseman
What the heck is it with people here and demanding unconditional surrenders?

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:46am
by loomer
Maybe Afghanistan should take a moment from its busy schedule of developing germ warfare and trying not to be steamrolled to offer to host peace talks.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:47am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Lascaris wrote:Shall we make the ships then standardized models like BB1925, BB1920 and so on with fixed size and capacity of course? By the same logic you don't give a shit for aircraft why should someone give a shit for the ships? :P
The bigger difference is that there are lots more aircraft manufacturers then, and I have no damn intention of going through an entire catalogue of aircraft made by manufacturers just waiting to go bankrupt or collapse or bought over in the next few decades.

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 09:52am
by DarthShady
Steve wrote:*nod* Cool.
I'm assuming my construction is cool with the mods then?
Thanas wrote:He demanded the complete and unconditional surrender of the Soviet Union. That was the only thing he wrote.
:lol:

I haven't laughed this hard in days. What the hell is Beo thinking?

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Posted: 2010-01-10 10:07am
by Steve
Thanas wrote:He demanded the complete and unconditional surrender of the Soviet Union. That was the only thing he wrote.
.....please bear with me Thanas, but I find that so incredulous I'm still having trouble believing it. :shock:

:banghead: :banghead:

Somebody is getting a L.J. Gibbs-style Dope Slap to the head when I get the full details. :evil: