Page 38 of 50

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-14 04:06pm
by Akhlut
Well, I hope everyone gets a kick out of that post; I've been struggling to actually write, and I figured better to write something and get everything flowing again then just to sit and hope for inspiration to hit me.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-14 04:34pm
by Simon_Jester
Sweet. Long live the Duke!

Honestly, Akhlut, I would very much like to see more posts in this vein, about various galactic events, GODDAMN UNREAL TIME or otherwise. They're good, they can present an interesting outside viewpoint on events, they're funny, they're relatively compact...

Eh, you get the idea.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-14 06:32pm
by Shroom Man 777
FEAR AND LOATHING IN BEEEF VEGAS!

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-14 10:12pm
by Fingolfin_Noldor
My Fenrisians should have mauled some humans for good measure on the excuse that they aren't xenophobic enough.

Instead, I was content with them mauling Bragulans.

DAMN

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-14 10:23pm
by Siege
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:More xenos to add to the pet list.
Am I the only one who imagines the God Emperor saying this with a Gollum voice?

My precccciousssss Xenossssss.... *strokes Tau skull*

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-14 10:33pm
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Siege wrote:
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:More xenos to add to the pet list.
Am I the only one who imagines the God Emperor saying this with a Gollum voice?

My precccciousssss Xenossssss.... *strokes Tau skull*
Actually, I would rather imagine him giving a nice pat to his pet Fenrisian.... :D

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-14 10:48pm
by Simon_Jester
I bet he has a moogle as a teddy bear-equivalent... :D

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-14 11:29pm
by fgalkin
Is there a Chamarran pet lobby in the Imperium? :D

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 01:17am
by Simon_Jester
Chamarran pets are deemed too dangerous for good God-Emperor fearing orthodox subjects of the Imperium, comrade.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 01:54am
by RogueIce
Simon_Jester wrote:I bet he has a moogle as a teddy bear-equivalent... :D
Doesn't everybody?

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 04:50am
by PeZook
Well, we vivisect them

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 07:39am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Simon_Jester wrote:Chamarran pets are deemed too dangerous for good God-Emperor fearing orthodox subjects of the Imperium, comrade.
Yeah... we'd have to lobotomize them probably...

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 12:37pm
by Simon_Jester
I think you misunderstood, Fin. It's not that they're too smart; it's that they're too sexy.

Some things, you just can't afford to domesticate.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 03:55pm
by Force Lord
Oi, my mind's burnt. Damn writer's block...

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 04:17pm
by fgalkin
Simon_Jester wrote:I think you misunderstood, Fin. It's not that they're too smart; it's that they're too sexy.

Some things, you just can't afford to domesticate.
Yes, I don't think the God-Emperor approves of bestiality. :)

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 05:05pm
by Master_Baerne
Seriously, Fin, you want to re-think this whole xenopet business. They could steal your precioussssss (bodily fluids).

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 05:35pm
by Simon_Jester
See, that's why you want to avoid pet Chamarrans. Too much risk of that. Giant bears and moogles aren't as much of a threat in that department as catgirls.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 07:23pm
by Simon_Jester
Next Zebes update posted- finally!

Here and in the next chapter, we get to see my take on the role of Heim-capable ships in combat. Bear in mind that the Kavool Empire is a small shoal polity; they've had to learn a lot more about Heim drive than most normal nations would bother to find out. It's something of a specialty, really.

Any resemblance to a Romulan warbird from Star Trek is... not coincidental. ;)

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 07:57pm
by fgalkin
Awesome update. And rather interesting to me, since I'm probably the only polity in the galaxy where everything, from worldships and space monsters to shuttlecraft comes with a Heim drive. :D

*Takes notes*

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 08:41pm
by Simon_Jester
You will note, however, that these ships do have fundamental problems. For one, their accuracy isn't stellar- they'd tend to outright miss when firing at anything much smaller than a battlecruiser. For another, Heim-capable munitions are large; their magazine capacity is even less stellar than their accuracy.

And third and finally... well, you'll have to wait for the next chapter to find out what the third problem is.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 08:58pm
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Master_Baerne wrote:Seriously, Fin, you want to re-think this whole xenopet business. They could steal your precioussssss (bodily fluids).
Oh no matter. We make sure we lobotomize them such that they aren't much of a threat.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 09:03pm
by Simon_Jester
That doesn't make Chamarrans less of a threat to the souls of good Byzantinians.

I still think you're missing the point here...

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 09:14pm
by fgalkin
Simon_Jester wrote:
And third and finally... well, you'll have to wait for the next chapter to find out what the third problem is.
I suspect I already know what the third problem is.
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:
Master_Baerne wrote:Seriously, Fin, you want to re-think this whole xenopet business. They could steal your precioussssss (bodily fluids).
Oh no matter. We make sure we lobotomize them such that they aren't much of a threat.
Your theocracy is missing the "theo" part.
fgalkin wrote:Yes, I don't think the God-Emperor approves of bestiality. :)

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 09:28pm
by Fingolfin_Noldor
The Chamarrans are really on my pet list to be honest. Some part of the Imperium regards them as some kind of abhorrent form of humanity. Impure.

As for my theocracy, we are rather technocratic in some ways. Technocratic, because we need tools to crush xenos with it. Technology that serves the needs of war are always pursued with relentless vigour.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread IV

Posted: 2011-01-15 10:08pm
by Simon_Jester
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:As for my theocracy, we are rather technocratic in some ways. Technocratic, because we need tools to crush xenos with it. Technology that serves the needs of war are always pursued with relentless vigour.
You call that a Technocracy?

[points to ray guns, slide rules, chromey buildings, scientists running government, embassy SCIENCE! officers, and guys reverse-engineering vegemite over the weekend]

Now this is a technocracy. You are just a guy who builds very large battleships and festoons them with skullspikeskullbannerspikeskulls.