Really Mean Art

AMP: sci-fi art, regular art, pictures, photos, comics, music, etc.

Moderator: Beowulf

Post Reply
User avatar
Dargos
Jedi Knight
Posts: 963
Joined: 2002-08-30 07:37am
Location: At work
Contact:

Really Mean Art

Post by Dargos »

linky

The photographer purposely provoked the toddlers (all under three years of age) to have these emotional outbursts. As a father of three children, I have to say this jerks my chain a little. I have no problems with photographers capturing all human emotion, but to purposely torment (yes, giving a small child a lollipop and then taking it away to make them cry is torment in my book) to capture the emotion, is just low class. What do you think?

(Edited original title from "Is this art" to something else...well...because yes it is art...in a really mean way.)
If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.
User avatar
Dargos
Jedi Knight
Posts: 963
Joined: 2002-08-30 07:37am
Location: At work
Contact:

Post by Dargos »

Image
This little boy looks just like my youngest...I swear it breaks my heart.
If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

I wonder how many of the parents up in arms against these photos had their kids circumcised?

As for torment...hmmm... well, I don't think it's anything that bad and it's unlikely to leave lasting damage and in the short term the kid gets more happiness out of it (since iirc, they get the lolly after the photo is took). I wouldn't try to stop the artist from doing it.

As for it being "low class" I suppose it is, yeah.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
Post Reply