If the above has you wondering, "What the fuck is THAT all about?" check out the "What's New" section here:
http://h4h.com/louis/vsfaq.html
Comments welcome!

Moderator: Vympel
Wayne has, actually, already addressed this issue on his site.Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:Allso regarding this "ISDs cant stand sunlight" claim, i found a nice page that tell something about blue giants, according to it, a blue giant of the largest type has surface temperature of over 25 000 k, and Daala's ISDs were parked near 7 of those things, yeah ISDs are weak to sunlight indeed
I know, i just brought up the temperature of the stars.Master of Ossus wrote:Wayne has, actually, already addressed this issue on his site.Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:Allso regarding this "ISDs cant stand sunlight" claim, i found a nice page that tell something about blue giants, according to it, a blue giant of the largest type has surface temperature of over 25 000 k, and Daala's ISDs were parked near 7 of those things, yeah ISDs are weak to sunlight indeed
http://h4h.com/louis/suns.html
I haven't seen Icehawk's stuff. Is he the designated Trekkie to dig up Darksaber for 2003?Master of Ossus wrote:Have you shown this to Icehawk? I confess that I did not check his source, but it is now clear that he was blatantly and intentionally misrepresenting the book in order to further his own ludicrous vendetta.
Thanks, RFoH! BTW, Lord Edam believes that seven blue-giant stars are less powerful than Athega was in the "sunlight" category...Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:I know, i just brought up the temperature of the stars.Master of Ossus wrote:Wayne has, actually, already addressed this issue on his site.Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:Allso regarding this "ISDs cant stand sunlight" claim, i found a nice page that tell something about blue giants, according to it, a blue giant of the largest type has surface temperature of over 25 000 k, and Daala's ISDs were parked near 7 of those things, yeah ISDs are weak to sunlight indeed
http://h4h.com/louis/suns.html
Yes. You may read his various distortions of the truth or demands for UNGODLY amounts of proof here:Lord Poe wrote:I haven't seen Icehawk's stuff. Is he the designated Trekkie to dig up Darksaber for 2003?Master of Ossus wrote:Have you shown this to Icehawk? I confess that I did not check his source, but it is now clear that he was blatantly and intentionally misrepresenting the book in order to further his own ludicrous vendetta.
Hehehe. I saw that. I think its also funny you're pointing him to argument #2, which is the one I had with DarkStar!Master of Ossus wrote:Yes. You may read his various distortions of the truth or demands for UNGODLY amounts of proof here:
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... c&start=25
I've already brought up your website, so their is no reason to mention it again.
Note that Icehawk holds the position that it is impossibly to derive the firepower of an ISD without also knowing how much energy the said ship uses for LIFE SUPPORT.
pg.67: "I am siphoning off all power from the turbolaser batteries," she said, "and concentrating our entire first strike on the ion cannon."
No, Wayne, Lord Edam believes seven blue-giant stars and being further away from them than from Athega means the ISDs encounter less energy. Of course, you'll ignore this like youhave every other time, prefering instead to believe your idiotic "more power at any range" simply because there's 7 stars instead of 1.Lord Poe wrote: Thanks, RFoH! BTW, Lord Edam believes that seven blue-giant stars are less powerful than Athega was in the "sunlight" category...
Uhm, if im not dead wrong the 3 ISDs were near the center of the nebula where the stars were allso, 7 blue giants do emit more energy you know than one yellow star.Lord Edam wrote:No, Wayne, Lord Edam believes seven blue-giant stars and being further away from them than from Athega means the ISDs encounter less energy. Of course, you'll ignore this like youhave every other time, prefering instead to believe your idiotic "more power at any range" simply because there's 7 stars instead of 1.Lord Poe wrote: Thanks, RFoH! BTW, Lord Edam believes that seven blue-giant stars are less powerful than Athega was in the "sunlight" category...
Well, that really depends on the amount of energy the yellow star is actually putting out, doesn't it?Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote: Uhm, if im not dead wrong the 3 ISDs were near the center of the nebula where the stars were allso, 7 blue giants do emit more energy you know than one yellow star.
Last time I checked, the size and color of the star were indicative of the amount of energy they put out. Maybe astronomy has changed in the last few months?Lord Edam wrote:Well, that really depends on the amount of energy the yellow star is actually putting out, doesn't it?Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote: Uhm, if im not dead wrong the 3 ISDs were near the center of the nebula where the stars were allso, 7 blue giants do emit more energy you know than one yellow star.
So according to your astronomy, size,luminosity,temperature etcetera have nothing to do with the actual energy output of the star?Lord Edam wrote:Well, that really depends on the amount of energy the yellow star is actually putting out, doesn't it?Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote: Uhm, if im not dead wrong the 3 ISDs were near the center of the nebula where the stars were allso, 7 blue giants do emit more energy you know than one yellow star.
And if we were perfectly honest, we'd admit the total energy is less important than the proportion of the total energy that the ISD is actually getting hit by, wouldn't we?
So simply saying that one example disproves the other because it has more, presumably hotter stars is your classic no math argument, right?
Hasn't changed much at all in this area. The colour and size of the star are indicative of the amount of energy they put out.Slartibartfast wrote:Last time I checked, the size and color of the star were indicative of the amount of energy they put out. Maybe astronomy has changed in the last few months?Lord Edam wrote: Well, that really depends on the amount of energy the yellow star is actually putting out, doesn't it?
to compare the energy they are giving out you also need the size. Colour only tells you the power output per unit area of the surface. An A-class white dwarf would put out over 12 orders of mangitude less power than an A-class giant, yet both could be the same colour.Ghost Rider wrote:Nope...still pretty much the same.
So he does know he just answered his own question by indicating the color...right?
Where do I say that? I comment that the colour (temperature) of a star is less important than the energy it puts out (it's luminosity). Of course, luminosity is a direct product of the colour and size, so in reality what I said was that we need to know more than just the colour of a star before we can decide if a ship near it is getting less energy than a ship near a different coloured star.Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:So according to your astronomy, size,luminosity,temperature etcetera have nothing to do with the actual energy output of the star?Lord Edam wrote:Well, that really depends on the amount of energy the yellow star is actually putting out, doesn't it?
And if we were perfectly honest, we'd admit the total energy is less important than the proportion of the total energy that the ISD is actually getting hit by, wouldn't we?
So simply saying that one example disproves the other because it has more, presumably hotter stars is your classic no math argument, right?