I'm curious how this happened, because it's fucking annoying. I'm also interested in ideas of how I can get this shit the fuck off my computer.

Moderator: Thanas
I already did that. Unless chkdsk /f is different to the 'schedule scandisk' thing (which I doubt, since it appears scandisk=chkdsk these days). It didn't turn anything up.Uraniun235 wrote:My next stab at it would be to run Chkdsk /f (which will require a restart) and then try deleting it.
Alternatively, maybe try deleting it while running in Safe Mode?
Eh, those options always worked whenever I've come across a file that wouldn't delete (which very rarely happens).Stark wrote:Sigh. I don't mean to sound rude, but when someone says 'have you tried command prompt' and 'reboot', I just want to fucking stab them. Yes, I've fucking tried the command prompt. Yes, I've rebooted. What am I, a monkey? My first option when confronted with a problem is not to ask people who might say 'hmm try rebooting', sorry.
It won't delete in safe mode, I'm clean of viruses and spyware, and nothing is running that is holding it open. I tried unlocker, and it gave me a permissions debug error. I've run scandisk, I've tried copying a known-good copy over the same file, all with no success. The file plays fine (it jumps a bit at the start), but I can't find anything that will allow me to change anything about it.
It seems obvious that the file is simply corrupt and I can't write to it. Is there a tool to let me just remove it from the filesystem? And don't say 'lol del lol'.
Oh I see. Thanks for the heads-up, I'll stop wasting my time. I'd pretty much exhausted all my options before I posted, so perhaps I'll just wait for a fix.Edi wrote:It's also possible that you might be stuck with that file until Microsoft releases a patch to fix the problem. Undeletable files on Vista as well as inability to move files is a known Vista problem that has been fairly widespread but has not affected all systems. You can probably find more information from MS support pages and forums. I have no idea how to fix that, but the general impression I got from the articles I read (admittedly a few months back) was that if the problem manifests, the user is fucked.
Yeah, I'd looked through already: no links to the file.Beowulf wrote:A last idea is use Process Explorer to search to see if anything has a handle to it open, and forcefully close that handle.
Heh, I've never tried doing anything while Explorer is gone - Vista brings it back pretty quick-smart, though. Worth a shot, though, and it's an interesting idea.U235 wrote:Oh wait! I remember what I did when I had something like this in XP! (or was it 2K...)
Open a command prompt and Task Manager. Navigate to where the file is in the command prompt and get ready to delete the file. Using Task Manager, end the explorer.exe process. Then try deleting the file through the command prompt.
When you're done, whether or not it was successful, you can go to File -> Run in Task Manager and type in Explorer and your desktop should come right back.
Window's hasn't run ontop of real MSDOS for decadesFingolfin_Noldor wrote:Does this Vista still retain that old MSDOS prompt safe mode? Is this command prompt in the Vista itself?
Win95/98/Me if I recall, had a 16 bit component that was in some ways tied to MSDOS. Incidentally, they came with MSDOS 7.0 and can be accessed if one presses the F8 key on start up and chooses the MSDOS prompt option.Resinence wrote:Window's hasn't run ontop of real MSDOS for decadesFingolfin_Noldor wrote:Does this Vista still retain that old MSDOS prompt safe mode? Is this command prompt in the Vista itself?
My original idea was that in the MSDOS mode, very few services are running, and it might remove any possible conflicts that might otherwise exist.Resinence wrote:Win98 came out almost 10 years ago, obviously "decades" was hyperbole
XP had a Dos emulator just like Vista does, but it's not part of the OS anymore and you cannot access it on startup. All of the WinNT line runs without the need of DOS, part of the reason microsoft adopted it for the clients as well as servers over Win32 (a mistake in my opinion, they should have just used a new CLI without the memory limitations of DOS, sometimes running without a GUI is useful). Vista has safe mode but all it does is load a different hardware profile that doesn't include non-MS drivers and disables some services.