except no multi. OH MY GOD, ACTUAL AI.
Don't mind that at all. I have plenty of games that have multiplayer so its good to hear of a game where the AI is not so retared.
Is SM:AC as good as people to make it out to be? I hear a lot of people saying its one of the best "Civ" games don't and how it managed several concepts like civics better then Civ IV. Its another game I may want to have a go with and I faintly remember playing the demo years ago.
Supreme Ruler 2010/2020 for near-future badness.
Game sounds pretty good then. Civ IV's Next War mod essentially had this concept but as said; it was too close to a normal game of Civ and it just did not take itself seriously. The premise is great really. A military build up between several large super powers, new techs being researched and used, world surviving off what resources it has left with life adapting to that. The thing was that it was treated all like some kind of zany soft Sci Fi you would see in a 1970's film. Leaders acted like little children waving their best toys around (this is a problem with the leaders in civ imo, they acted like children), saying to "Feeeaaar them!!!. Some descriptions of new techs and weapons were mucked up (mechs being bought because they were "cool" to leaders. I could understand the intimidation factor but cool?). Other stupid concepts existed such as a nuke war cracking the planets crust which was in the end just a way to stop spamming them.
In the end I probably expected too much from it but the premise its awesome. I would love a proper Civ games were you are struggling to survive in a changing world, having to adapt and get your nation through hard times, part of the reason I am asking here. Maybe I should join SD Net world.....