2k3 Servers, XP workstations, no form of config management to speak of, small userbase of around 500 or so.
What do you push for and why?
Arguments put forward so far. SCCM because it'll tie what's already there together nicely (WSUS, MDT), ZCM10 because we've already got some Zen experts, BMC because the support company is trying to become a BMC provider and some of the servers are already using BMC monitoring.
SCCM vs ZCM10 vs BMC vs WTF
Moderator: Thanas
Re: SCCM vs ZCM10 vs BMC vs WTF
You try arstechnica? They have a forum dedicated to discussion on servers and enterprise installations. I don't think anyone here can really give you a good answer.
"preemptive killing of cops might not be such a bad idea from a personal saftey[sic] standpoint..." --Keevan Colton
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan
Re: SCCM vs ZCM10 vs BMC vs WTF
AgreedBeowulf wrote:You try arstechnica? They have a forum dedicated to discussion on servers and enterprise installations. I don't think anyone here can really give you a good answer.
I work in the industry and I have little fucking clue what he said. But them I'm a hardware guy not a software guy, the likely hood of someone here being able to hold a semi-intellgent disscussion on this subject are rather low at roughly a thousand active members.
"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
-
Spyder
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: 2002-09-03 03:23am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: SCCM vs ZCM10 vs BMC vs WTF
I was putting a Statement of Work together and had SDN open at the time. Figured, what the hell.
Might take a gander at ars though.
Might take a gander at ars though.
