Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Ziggy Stardust
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3114
Joined: 2006-09-10 10:16pm
Location: Research Triangle, NC

Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Ziggy Stardust »

As told by the BBC...
Japanese scientists are celebrating the successful deployment of their solar sail, Ikaros.

The 200-sq-m (2,100-sq-ft) membrane is attached to a small disc-shaped spacecraft that was put in orbit last month by an H-IIA rocket.

Ikaros will demonstrate the principle of using sunlight as a simple and efficient means of propulsion.

The technique has long been touted as a way of moving spacecraft around the Solar System using no chemical fuels.

The mission team will be watching to see if Ikaros produces a measurable acceleration, and how well its systems are able to steer the craft through space.

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (Jaxa) said in a statement that its scientists and engineers had begun to deploy the solar sail on 3 June (JST).

On 10 June, Jaxa said, confirmation was received that the sail had expanded successfully. Some thin-film solar cells embedded in the membrane were even generating power, it added.

Space applications

The principle of solar sailing is a simple one. Photons, or particles of light, falling on a highly reflective, ultra-thin (in this case, just 7.5 microns) surface will exert a pressure.

The force is tiny but continuous, and over time should produce a considerable velocity.

Solar sails will never replace conventional propulsion systems like chemical thrusters, but they do have the potential to play a much greater role in certain types of space mission.

Louis Friedman, from the space advocacy group The Planetary Society, is a big supporter of the technology. The society's LightSail-1, a much smaller mission than Ikaros, could launch by the year's end. He told BBC News recently: "The potential that we all seek is the ultra-lightweight, very fast spacecraft that doesn't use fuel.

"That's the future of interstellar travel; that's the long-term goal. The intermediate goals are to be able to use this technology to 'hover' in interplanetary space at particular points for monitoring, say, the Sun or monitoring the Earth's geomagnetic poles or magneto-tail; and then also to fly between the planets without using fuel."

Already some satellites in geostationary orbit above the Earth use flaps on the ends of their solar panels to catch the pressure of sunlight to maintain their correct attitude.

This leads to a considerable saving on the fuel that would otherwise have to be sent surging through the satellites' thrusters, and operators have found this strategy can extend the longevity of some missions by many months.

Venus 'piggy-back'

Deploying a large membrane in space is a challenging task, however.

The circular Ikaros was launched with the sail wrapped around it. The plan was to unbutton the four weighted corners of the membrane and allow them to fly outwards as the central module turned. This was expected to pull the sail taut. A camera mounted on the central hub of Ikaros confirmed the sail had indeed been drawn flat.

Japanese scientists must now hope they can control this huge spinning film. If instabilities develop in the sail, it could start to bend and fold, ruining the experiment.

Ikaros was a piggy-back payload to Japan's Venus orbiter, Akatsuki.

The pair were boosted in to space on 21 May (JST) from the Tanegashima Space Center.

Akatsuki will arrive at Venus in December. Key goals include finding definitive evidence for lightning and for active volcanoes.
How it works:

Image

Pretty need. I don't know nearly enough about the subject to know how revolutionary this is, but at the very least this is another sci-fi fantasy become reality. One day, God willing, the Japanese will basically turn into Battlefleet Gothic ...
User avatar
Temujin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1300
Joined: 2010-03-28 07:08pm
Location: Occupying Wall Street (In Spirit)

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Temujin »

While I don't consider solar sails to be a primary propulsion system for the future (I'll stick with Orion drives thank you), as a supplemental system or for low cost transport and exploration its pretty cool.
Image
Mr. Harley: Your impatience is quite understandable.
Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.
Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I'm very sorry... I wish it were otherwise.

"I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all. I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe.
If I cannot satisfy the one, I will indulge the other." – Frankenstein's Creature on the glacier[/size]
Modax
Padawan Learner
Posts: 278
Joined: 2008-10-30 11:53pm

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Modax »

I just don't get it. Thrust is a force. Force = mass * acceleration. Light has no mass, so by this equation at least, getting thrust from light shouldn't work. I know the answer has to do with quantum mechanics, but knowing that doesn't help my understanding much. I wonder though, before quantum mechanics, would physicists have said that solar sails are physically impossible? How come there is conservation of momentum but not conservation of force?
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Samuel »

Light has no mass
Photons have mass and light is made of photons.
Modax
Padawan Learner
Posts: 278
Joined: 2008-10-30 11:53pm

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Modax »

No. If photons had mass, they couldn't travel at the speed of light, could they? They would have to have infinite kinetic energy.
Grandmaster Jogurt
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1725
Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Grandmaster Jogurt »

Photons don't have mass, but they do have momentum. The momentum p is equal to h*ν/c, or Planck's constant times the frequency over the speed of light (alternately, p = h/λ, or Planck's constant over the wavelenth).
Modax
Padawan Learner
Posts: 278
Joined: 2008-10-30 11:53pm

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Modax »

okay, but then how do you get force out of momentum and no mass? is f=ma just obsolete? Or does the solar sail move in some crazy mixed-up way without any force in newtons being exerted on it? EDIT: maybe my problem is partly that I don't understand what momentum is, or (especially) how it differs from force and kinetic energy.
Grandmaster Jogurt
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1725
Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Grandmaster Jogurt »

The units of m*a are kg*m/s2. The units of momentum are kg*m/s. Thus force is also the change in momentum over time. Since conservation of momentum holds, photons striking an object will change the momentum of that object, thus providing a force.
Sky Captain
Jedi Master
Posts: 1267
Joined: 2008-11-14 12:47pm
Location: Latvia

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Sky Captain »

Temujin wrote:While I don't consider solar sails to be a primary propulsion system for the future (I'll stick with Orion drives thank you), as a supplemental system or for low cost transport and exploration its pretty cool.
In near future solar sails would be most useful for robotic probes where time isn't a priority, but mass and cost is and satellite station keeping. For heavy manned missions aceleration is just too low and that means it would take nearly forever to go anywhere.
Modax
Padawan Learner
Posts: 278
Joined: 2008-10-30 11:53pm

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by Modax »

Thanks. I will try to remember "force is change is momentum over time". Although I'm still not exactly sure how this is different from saying "force is change in kinetic energy." Okay, so momentum is the product of mass and velocity, while kinetic energy increases with the square of velocity. Still, I think I'm less confused than I was. As long as no one brings up inertia and torque. :|
User avatar
starslayer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 731
Joined: 2008-04-04 08:40pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Japanese successfully deploy solar sail

Post by starslayer »

Modax wrote:Thanks. I will try to remember "force is change is momentum over time". Although I'm still not exactly sure how this is different from saying "force is change in kinetic energy."
Force is not change in kinetic energy, work is. Indeed, force can't possibly be a simple change in energy because such a change still has units of energy, not force (ΔT = T2-T1; the units never changed). However, with change of momentum with respect to time, you get Δp/Δt, which has units of kg*m/s * 1/s = kg*m/s2 = N.

Anyway, in SR, you find pretty quickly that even when something is standing still, it has energy associated with its mass (yeah, I know, right? Not like E = mc2 is the most famous physics equation ever or anything). The total energy of an object then becomes E = γmc2, where γ = 1/sqrt(1-v2/c2). As it turns out, if you then take the product of the four-momentum* with itself (so, pμpμ = -(p0**)^2+p*p), you get -m2c2. Now, p0 = γmc = E/c, so -E2/c2 + p2 = -m2c2. Multiply by c2, and shuffle terms around, and you get E2 = p2c2+m2c4. Hey, wait a second... this seems to say an object can have energy and momentum, even if it has no mass!

What's that you say? Energy and momentum depend directly on mass? Well, damn. But wait! If we require the object to travel at the speed of light, γ becomes 1/0, while m is also 0, so we get 0/0, an indeterminate form. So, in a wonderful loophole (Griffiths calls it a "loophole worthy of a congressman" in his Introduction to Electrodynamics, an excellent book), m and γ "cancel", leaving us with non-zero or infinite energy and momentum. As Griffiths notes, though, this would appear to be a completely spurious conclusion, except we already have an example which fits this: photons, and they do indeed obey the equation E = pc.

*If you not familiar with four-vectors, note that pμpμ is not p2 (exponent this time! see below); that is p*p, the vector momentum dotted with itself.

**This is not an exponent (here), it is a component index, so pμ = (p0, p1, etc.). Another note; pμ is called a contravariant four-vector, while pμ is a covariant four-vector. The only difference is a minus sign on the zeroth component, so that p0 = -p0. Then pμpμ works just like a normal dot product, except we can write the first term, p0p0, as -(p0)2.
Post Reply