Spectre_nz wrote:That's because it is sapphire.
Edit:At least, that's what it sounds like from the info in the article. Sapphire is aluminum oxide.
They're slightly different.
Sapphires and rubies (ie, corundum) are just AlO3 with minor impurities.
This AION stuff is Aluminium oxy
nitride; there's some nitrogen in there. Wiki gives its formula is (AlN)x.(AlO3)1-x, so it sounds like they're sintering corundum along with Aluminium nitride to give this material. Exactly what the benefits this stuff has over synthetic sapphire I don't know, it may be a material property that's not immediately obvious or something to do with ease of manufacture.
Sapphire (and rubies, both of which are actually Al2O3, not AlO3 if I have my information correct) is a crystalline solid and thus will fracture easily along certain angles called cleavage planes. So, very, very hard and durable unless you hit it
just right and it shatters. If transparent aluminum armor doesn't have natural cleavage planes then that might be an area where it is superior in performance on the battlefield to pure sapphire.
I also found several statements on line that, while expensive, this material is cheaper to produce than synthetic sapphire. That will also have a significant impact on where and when and how much is used.
Synthetic sapphire is transparent and used for small armoured windows on sensors and the scratch resistant faceplates of watches, so it’s not like the problem was they couldn't make synthetic sapphire. Maybe they just couldn't make it big enough. Or couldn't laminate it to regular glass very well.
Synthetic sapphire of high enough quality to be
transparent is expensive to produce in quantity. Non-transparent, impure sapphire, on the other hand, is relatively cheap, which is why it's the most common variety of grit found in sandpaper these days.
As for timing -
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home was released in 1986. This stuff apparently achieved viability in 2005. It's entirely possible some geek when home from the movie and though "Hey, I bet I could actually make this stuff..." or the new product was name for the stuff in the movie. Or even that Roddenberry or someone on staff new of someone trying to develop this stuff. Would be interesting to have a definitive answer.