In any case really hoping I didn't just make a total fool of myself

Moderator: K. A. Pital
Anthony Everitt is neither an ancient historian nor a classicist. His books are widely derided as being inaccurate and not recommendable in the historical circles. I would not trust any speculation of his unless he can source it convincingly.TC Pilot wrote:I read a biography of Augustus a few years back (Augustus: The Life of Rome's First Emperor by Anthony Everitt, a nice book if a bit simple) that speculated that Julia had republican sentiments. While I'm not in a position to vouch for any particular theory, I personally find that more convincing than her being a serial-adulteress
I'm not particularly surprised by that, given how the content of his work struck me as rather simple. Sadly my range of reading material on Antiquity has rather markedly narrowed recently, so I take what I can get.Thanas wrote:Anthony Everitt is neither an ancient historian nor a classicist. His books are widely derided as being inaccurate and not recommendable in the historical circles. I would not trust any speculation of his unless he can source it convincingly.
Meh. That does not indicate anything at all, considering the vast majority did not get emancipated back then.harbringer wrote:Well I agree her conduct was almost certainly exaggerated after all I really can't see her as a prostitute - she after all had plenty of money to draw on. I still feel that she was strong willed and due to her father perhaps more powerful than the average woman at the time (yes I am referring to the quote about troublesome women her father apparently made). I just felt that in a time when most women were desperately trying to get social standing through marriage
(well they still do to an extent) she seemed to be a bit of a rebel, maybe because her father obviously didn't trust her to make decisions as he didn't emancipate her even when married.