A new chick tract...Interpretations?

Sienthal · Post by **Sienthal** » 2003-03-18 12:22am

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/5022/5022_01.asp

Hmm...Jack's been taking a look at world affairs through beer goggles, I would think. But seriously, it seems like he encourages terrorist action like that...

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2003-03-18 12:22am

We have a thread about this, I think, somewhere in the SLAM forum.

Sienthal · Post by **Sienthal** » 2003-03-18 12:26am

Ah, my bad, I thought this would fit better in off-topic and only check the history here.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2003-03-18 12:41am

I've always wondered why the "And-1" clothing company hasn't sued Chick for using their character to represent God...

Post by **Gandalf** » 2003-03-18 01:36am

As usual, Chick is craptacular.

Sriad · Post by **Sriad** » 2003-03-18 02:28am

I'll just mention here that I'm AMAZED that chick.com isn't a porn site.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2003-03-18 03:21am

It's even more disjointed and weird than your average Chick tract.

And THAT's saying something...

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-03-18 10:01pm

It's been posted a few weeks back, but I just have to say it again: That has to be one of the more nonsensical tracts. It goes from Christians being persecuted to an inane and offensive rant against Masons. Still, there's worse. Perhaps we should have a contest to see who can fish out the worst Chick Tract or something.

Sienthal · Post by **Sienthal** » 2003-03-18 10:06pm

To the Mods: THANK you whoever deleted my repeated posts...I did not mean to do it, but the damn thing decided that my one click was as good as two,

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2003-03-18 10:09pm

Shoot Chick for being a Terrorist-Monger...