Is this a way that Treknology could defeat a Jedi?
Moderator: Vympel
-
- Resident Redneck
- Posts: 4979
- Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
- Location: Around the corner
- Contact:
Is this a way that Treknology could defeat a Jedi?
This idea was proposed by another guy I know, but, I decided to post it here to see your thoughts.
Could a Jedi be defeated by a Transporter? Transporters have the ability to filter out any microbial impurities and the like. What if the bio-filter was simply set to weed out the midi chlorians? Would this not render the Jedi's powers ineffective?
Could a Jedi be defeated by a Transporter? Transporters have the ability to filter out any microbial impurities and the like. What if the bio-filter was simply set to weed out the midi chlorians? Would this not render the Jedi's powers ineffective?
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Show that a Jedi can't defeat a transporter, since we saw that Roga Danar was able to do so, and he is hardly as unusual as a Jedi.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Who? What? Where? Huh? Is this a trek reference? Sorry I just don't know who this person is, and am looking for a brief explanation.Darth Wong wrote:Show that a Jedi can't defeat a transporter, since we saw that Roga Danar was able to do so, and he is hardly as unusual as a Jedi.
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Trek biofilters only work against already known substances, anyway Midichlorians may indicate a force potential but nothing says they actually are responsible for it.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Slartibartfast
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6730
- Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
- Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
- Contact:
He was a chemically enhanced soldier or something. He escaped a transporter beam by banging against it. Yes, I'm not making this up.Crown wrote:Who? What? Where? Huh? Is this a trek reference? Sorry I just don't know who this person is, and am looking for a brief explanation.Darth Wong wrote:Show that a Jedi can't defeat a transporter, since we saw that Roga Danar was able to do so, and he is hardly as unusual as a Jedi.
-
- BANNED
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: 2002-09-25 06:59pm
- Location: Suckling At The Teat Of Missmanners
Re: Is this a way that Treknology could defeat a Jedi?
Someone I know of once speculated that "midichlorian" is an etymological variation on the word "mitochondria". If that's true, then all living things in SW have them. But not all living things in SW are able to use the Force. This suggests that 2 things would happen if you "filter out" midichlorians through a transporter.Nathan F wrote:This idea was proposed by another guy I know, but, I decided to post it here to see your thoughts.
Could a Jedi be defeated by a Transporter? Transporters have the ability to filter out any microbial impurities and the like. What if the bio-filter was simply set to weed out the midi chlorians? Would this not render the Jedi's powers ineffective?
1. Force sensitivity will not be affected.
2. The subject will not survive for very long. But the subject will probably be really angry.
Maybe. I know midichlorians/mitochondria like I know my way around a hair salon, so don't expect me to be right on this one.
WHAAAAAAAAAT?!Slartibartfast wrote:He was a chemically enhanced soldier or something. He escaped a transporter beam by banging against it. Yes, I'm not making this up.Crown wrote:Who? What? Where? Huh? Is this a trek reference? Sorry I just don't know who this person is, and am looking for a brief explanation.
JADAFETWA
- Darth Negation
- Youngling
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 2003-03-11 01:52am
- Contact:
-
- BANNED
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: 2002-09-25 06:59pm
- Location: Suckling At The Teat Of Missmanners
Re: Is this a way that Treknology could defeat a Jedi?
Setting aside the other problems that have already been mentioned, what's the point of this elaborate scheme? If I caught a Jedi in a transporter beam (by no means a sure assumption, as others have noted), couldn't I just wide-beam disperse his ass, which has been done in at least one episode IIRC. Or just beam him into vacuum or whatever? Or is the specific intent to disable the Jedi without killing him?Nathan F wrote:Could a Jedi be defeated by a Transporter? Transporters have the ability to filter out any microbial impurities and the like. What if the bio-filter was simply set to weed out the midi chlorians? Would this not render the Jedi's powers ineffective?
-- Joe Momma
It's okay to kiss a nun; just don't get into the habit.
- Darth Servo
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8805
- Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
- Location: Satellite of Love
Re: Is this a way that Treknology could defeat a Jedi?
While there are some similarities (as DW has pointed out on his TPM revelations page), there is one critical difference: Mitochondria are passed from MOTHER to offspring. The sperm cells only contribute DNA. A few mitochondria in the sperm might make it into the egg, but the vast majority come from mom. Since Luke and Leia got their force ability from dad, they can't be mitochondria, and AOTC proved that the force is NOT genetic.Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:Someone I know of once speculated that "midichlorian" is an etymological variation on the word "mitochondria".
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com
"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com
"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
- SirNitram
- Rest in Peace, Black Mage
- Posts: 28367
- Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
- Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere
Re: Is this a way that Treknology could defeat a Jedi?
Whaaaa? Where did AOTC prove that access to the Force isn't genetic?Darth Servo wrote:While there are some similarities (as DW has pointed out on his TPM revelations page), there is one critical difference: Mitochondria are passed from MOTHER to offspring. The sperm cells only contribute DNA. A few mitochondria in the sperm might make it into the egg, but the vast majority come from mom. Since Luke and Leia got their force ability from dad, they can't be mitochondria, and AOTC proved that the force is NOT genetic.Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:Someone I know of once speculated that "midichlorian" is an etymological variation on the word "mitochondria".
Just because the Jedi aren't allowed sex/marriage doesn't mean it's not genetic. Hell, it might clinch it. Allow me an analogy from another series. In Discworld, magic is genetic, but Wizards are denied the right to get nookie or get married. Why? Well, it turns out that if a wizard does, and he has eight sons, the eighth will be a nasty motherfucker called a Sourcerer. Therefore, to prevent, you know, reality being torn apart by these guys, wizards were denied sex. Given that those Force-wielders born of Force-wielders we've seen are pretty powerful, it may be similar.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.
Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.
Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus
Debator Classification: Trollhunter
Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.
Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus
Debator Classification: Trollhunter
- Typhonis 1
- Rabid Monkey Scientist
- Posts: 5791
- Joined: 2002-07-06 12:07am
- Location: deep within a secret cloning lab hidden in the brotherhood of the monkey thread
As a two dimensional representation of her is enough to make strong men vomit blood, I shudder to think what adding another dimension would do.Typhonis 1 wrote:*L* have a three d hologram pop up of Janeway naked that will stop a jedi cold
Björn Paulsen
"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
A transporter might be able to defeat a jedi in the sense that instead of firing a bolt of bullet at them whoch they can physically block you can beam the bullet into them. How would they dodge that?
Hmmm.....I wonder where this tactic came from?
Hmmm.....I wonder where this tactic came from?
Wherever you go, there you are.
Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
- Lord Pounder
- Pretty Hate Machine
- Posts: 9695
- Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
- Location: Belfast, unfortunately
- Contact:
I don't see bio filters doing much against a Jedi. I've never seen a Trek transporter transport a moving target, so tatic one is to just keep moving. Second whos to say the bio filter will detect the Medichlorian in the 1st place. Its most likely to see them as part of a normal human and just leave them. The only way would be for the biofilter to be manually configured to remove them and that would require capture of a live Jedi and disecting them and do you see the UFP authorising that?
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
Gone, Never Forgotten
Actually, I meant it to show that transporters do work on moving targets.Kerneth wrote:That'd work as long as the Jedi's handy-dandy danger sense didn't tip them off in time for them to jump out of the way as the guy pulls the trigger.neoolong wrote:What about the microtransporter attached to the sniper rifle in DS9?
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
-
- BANNED
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: 2002-09-25 06:59pm
- Location: Suckling At The Teat Of Missmanners
Why are we getting so complicated here? One thing I learned from my VI days is not to overcomplicate tactics.
There are two very simple antipersonnel actions one can use a transporter for, depending on your objective:
1. Need to detain or disable the Jedi? Initiate transport and keep the motherfucker dematerialized in the pattern buffer.
2. Want to kill him? Beam him into space. Or into solid rock. Or into his grandma's carpet. You get the idea. No need to complicate things.
There are two very simple antipersonnel actions one can use a transporter for, depending on your objective:
1. Need to detain or disable the Jedi? Initiate transport and keep the motherfucker dematerialized in the pattern buffer.
2. Want to kill him? Beam him into space. Or into solid rock. Or into his grandma's carpet. You get the idea. No need to complicate things.
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
They've never had much luck beaming things onto starship-sized targets whose movement is not predictable. I don't see why it would be easier with a man-sized target, particularly if they have trouble scanning him (remember that they always have trouble scanning anything with an unusual "energy signature").Stravo wrote:A transporter might be able to defeat a jedi in the sense that instead of firing a bolt of bullet at them whoch they can physically block you can beam the bullet into them. How would they dodge that?
Hmmm.....I wonder where this tactic came from?
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Why are we even talking about using a transporter at all? First, we're assuming it must work, even though Roga Danar showed that transporters are not that hard to defeat. Second, we are disregarding the fact that a sufficiently large volume of firepower would defeat even a Jedi, so why play games?Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:Why are we getting so complicated here? One thing I learned from my VI days is not to overcomplicate tactics.
There are two very simple antipersonnel actions one can use a transporter for, depending on your objective:
1. Need to detain or disable the Jedi? Initiate transport and keep the motherfucker dematerialized in the pattern buffer.
2. Want to kill him? Beam him into space. Or into solid rock. Or into his grandma's carpet. You get the idea. No need to complicate things.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html