Accuracy of Wong's calculations.....

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Accuracy of Wong's calculations.....

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

A member from a forum where I usually go said this:
please do not reference anything from Stardestroyer.net. there was a huge debate on the other site i go to about SW vs ST, where i proved many of Mr. Wong's calculations inaccurate, and the correct calculations were nowhere near what he theorized. it actually caused some major debate on the stardestroyer.net forums, where Wong actually replied to some of my comments but basically just insulted my intelligence on the matter.

anyways, after saying that, i would say that SW would beat ST in some aspects, but ST would win in others. for example, im sure some Star Destroyers could take out Federation ships, but then again i think the Borg could take out the Death Star. it's all a matter of what you are comparing.
Now, are Wong's calculations correct? Aside from Wong, what other sources concur with him?

I am asking him on the sources and whatnot of this stuff he is saying.

But the point still remains: Are Wong's calcs accurate? Does any official cannon guide book concur with him to some degree?

No flames plz....
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

From what I've seen, yes.

The Incredible Cross Sections books for the movies are one of the sources.

The thing with SW is that most stuff published unless it contradicts the stuff associated directly with the movie is considered true, so if a novel says something happened and it doesn't directly contradict something in the movie, then it happened. So if a novel mentions that they have x number of ships, and this isn't contradicted by a movie that says they only have y number of ships, then they have x number of ships.

Or so I gathered.

There are others, but I'm tired and I'm sure someone else can answer better than I.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

You can tell him that he is right, Wong's calculations where quite off the mark when canon material on the issue was released from Lucasfilm, it seems that Wong's calculations where way too low.

Ofcourse Wong himself has said that his calculations are low-ends
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
generator_g1
Jedi Master
Posts: 1185
Joined: 2003-01-19 10:17pm
Location: Halfway between the gutter and the stars....

Post by generator_g1 »

please do not reference anything from Stardestroyer.net. there was a huge debate on the other site i go to about SW vs ST, where i proved many of Mr. Wong's calculations inaccurate, and the correct calculations were nowhere near what he theorized. it actually caused some major debate on the stardestroyer.net forums, where Wong actually replied to some of my comments but basically just insulted my intelligence on the matter.

anyways, after saying that, i would say that SW would beat ST in some aspects, but ST would win in others. for example, im sure some Star Destroyers could take out Federation ships, but then again i think the Borg could take out the Death Star. it's all a matter of what you are comparing.
Hmm...I wonder who wrote this and how he proved DW's calcs were wrong?
My FLICKR page! :D
Remember, people, commas are your friends. Love them, embrace them, cherish them, and for crying out loud, USE them.
Lee3
Redshirt
Posts: 16
Joined: 2003-05-18 11:25pm
Location: Syracuse, Utah

DW's calcs

Post by Lee3 »

Much as I hate to admit it (I always liked TOS and TNG) what he has written makes a lot of sense.

The only possible opponents for the SW civilization would be the Civilization from "Doc" Smith's Lensman series. Civilization/Boskonia is contained within this galaxy *and* Lundmark's Nebula so the number of worlds would be about par. The inertialess Drive allows them to travel at comparable speeds with the Empire ships.

It's hard to tell concerning shields and weapons. Doc Smith wrote vividly and visually, but didn't pin down these with figures of any type, so it is hard to judge "titanic" forces that raved through"ether". The stories were written in the 1930's, and grew more colossal in scale as the thing went on.

I don't think they had any ships nearly the size of some of the bigger Empire ships, but they did toss "Free" planets at enemy homeworlds in addition to having "millions" of ships in the grand fleet. As I am math deficient (at least beside Mr Wong)I wouldn't even attempt a comparison even if I had the judgement to rate Civilization's ships. Too bad.
Grey Lensman,
Galactic Patrol
Tellus
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

There are a great many people out there who claim to have defeated my calculations. Why not ask him to give you links to the threads on this very BBS where he supposedly accomplished this feat?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Darth Wong, we're not worthy! We're not worthy!

Your avatar really projects your wisdom. I'm not kidding.

Well, I asked him for sources and link.

Someone said that the cannon stuff proved Wong's calculations were WAY lower, care to show me some of the cannon stuff?
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

His site has a great deal of canon...I mean he has pics and references.

He's covered many of the bases towards his calculations and made special effort to use canon when possible.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
Bartman
Youngling
Posts: 140
Joined: 2002-12-18 08:13pm

Post by Bartman »

Darth Wong wrote:There are a great many people out there who claim to have defeated my calculations. Why not ask him to give you links to the threads on this very BBS where he supposedly accomplished this feat?
Exactly. Wong has taken great pains to detail both the methods and the calculations used to arrive at his figures. Your annonymous poster has apparently provided nothing more than a vague reference that at some point he has done the same and you should just trust him on that.

With Wong's numbers anyone can run the exact same calculations. For example if you don't trust his numbers derived from the asteroid scene in ESB, you can do your own analysis and compare your conclusions to his. After all, all his assumptions, calculations and conclusions are all right there. I have done so. And it doesn't take very long. If you do so you will likely find that your calculations are very close to Wong's.

My recomendation is to ask your annonymous poster to put up or shut up.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27383
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: DW's calcs

Post by NecronLord »

Lee3 wrote:The only possible opponents for the SW civilization would be the Civilization from "Doc" Smith's Lensman series.
Stop right there. There's loads of series out there that could trash the empire without working up a sweat. There's a thread listing some somewhere.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10301
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Post by Solauren »

From my understanding, the Star Wars incredible cross sections books are on the same level as the movies, where in they are the guides to the events and technologies shown. They don't contradict anything, they explain it in clear english.

(I only have the cross section book from the first movie/trilogy. Mind you the Death Star cross section is cool. THe reactor is like 10 miles in diameter!)

Anyway, please point out to the poster Darth Wong's calculations are low end and are supported as low end by these books. The primary guns on a "20 year old" Assault Ship (compared to an ISD) are 200 GIGATONS each. Depending on your calculation method, that's 500 TW (1 ft/ton = 2711.64 watts, 200 Gigatons = 200,000,000,000 tons. 200,000,000,000 tons = 542328000000000 watts or 542.328 Terrawatts) or higher.

(I am of the school of though that 200 Gigatons means gigatons measure in foot-pounds. In that case, my math is right. If its explosive power, then that's a LOW number)

Challenging Math is a very, very hard thing to do, especially math that is back up with each step of the calculation shown, and the relevant rules listed and referenced, and worked double checked.

On that note, my bases for measurements use in my example come from
http://www.sciencemadesimple.net/cgi-bin/easypower.cgi
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Solauren wrote:From my understanding, the Star Wars incredible cross sections books are on the same level as the movies, where in they are the guides to the events and technologies shown. They don't contradict anything, they explain it in clear english.
Actualy the ICS books are not on the same level as the movies. The movies are the highest level and nothing else can equal them. However, the ICS books are still in the Canon level and hence anything they say that isn't directly contradicted by the movies stands. Basicaly that means 99.99% of what the ICS books say can stand.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Solauren wrote:(I am of the school of though that 200 Gigatons means gigatons measure in foot-pounds. In that case, my math is right. If its explosive power, then that's a LOW number)
It's GT as in Gigatons of TNT
Or GT as in 4.184e18 joules.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37389
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Wongs Star Wars calculations where accurate based off the existing evidence. We now know that the Empires technology is even more powerful thanks to ICS. As for his Star Wars stuff, the only thing I find questionable is his Federation ship count. It appears to count a major refit or rebuild as taking the same resources as building a new ship.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
jegs2
Imperial Spook
Posts: 4782
Joined: 2002-08-22 06:23pm
Location: Alabama

Re: DW's calcs

Post by jegs2 »

Lee3 wrote:The only possible opponents for the SW civilization would be the Civilization from "Doc" Smith's Lensman series. Civilization/Boskonia is contained within this galaxy *and* Lundmark's Nebula so the number of worlds would be about par. The inertialess Drive allows them to travel at comparable speeds with the Empire ships.
There are a number of races (even in the ST universe) that could defeat the Empire. The folks who built that time rock thingie and the beings that can blink things in and out of existance come to mind. I call those the Enigma Demigod Super Races (EDSR). Morover, there are forces outside of ST that could lay waste the Empire. The Culture comes to mind.
John 3:16-18
Warwolves G2
The University of North Alabama Lions!
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

What board did this come from? I need to go thump this idiot.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Solauren wrote:From my understanding, the Star Wars incredible cross sections books are on the same level as the movies, where in they are the guides to the events and technologies shown. They don't contradict anything, they explain it in clear english.

(I only have the cross section book from the first movie/trilogy. Mind you the Death Star cross section is cool. THe reactor is like 10 miles in diameter!)

Anyway, please point out to the poster Darth Wong's calculations are low end and are supported as low end by these books. The primary guns on a "20 year old" Assault Ship (compared to an ISD) are 200 GIGATONS each. Depending on your calculation method, that's 500 TW (1 ft/ton = 2711.64 watts, 200 Gigatons = 200,000,000,000 tons. 200,000,000,000 tons = 542328000000000 watts or 542.328 Terrawatts) or higher.

(I am of the school of though that 200 Gigatons means gigatons measure in foot-pounds. In that case, my math is right. If its explosive power, then that's a LOW number)

Challenging Math is a very, very hard thing to do, especially math that is back up with each step of the calculation shown, and the relevant rules listed and referenced, and worked double checked.

On that note, my bases for measurements use in my example come from
http://www.sciencemadesimple.net/cgi-bin/easypower.cgi

You are totally wrong. 200 gigatons is over 800 million terajoules, and since TLs are 1/15second, that's over 12 billion terawatts. Gigaton is a unit of energy, 1 billion times a ton, which is 4 billion joules.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Accuracy of Wong's calculations.....

Post by Ender »

Shroom Man 777 wrote:A member from a forum where I usually go said this:
please do not reference anything from Stardestroyer.net. there was a huge debate on the other site i go to about SW vs ST, where i proved many of Mr. Wong's calculations inaccurate, and the correct calculations were nowhere near what he theorized. it actually caused some major debate on the stardestroyer.net forums, where Wong actually replied to some of my comments but basically just insulted my intelligence on the matter.

anyways, after saying that, i would say that SW would beat ST in some aspects, but ST would win in others. for example, im sure some Star Destroyers could take out Federation ships, but then again i think the Borg could take out the Death Star. it's all a matter of what you are comparing.
Now, are Wong's calculations correct? Aside from Wong, what other sources concur with him?

I am asking him on the sources and whatnot of this stuff he is saying.

But the point still remains: Are Wong's calcs accurate? Does any official cannon guide book concur with him to some degree?

No flames plz....
Do you have a link to that post please?
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Re: Accuracy of Wong's calculations.....

Post by Master of Ossus »

Shroom Man 777 wrote:A member from a forum where I usually go said this:
please do not reference anything from Stardestroyer.net. there was a huge debate on the other site i go to about SW vs ST, where i proved many of Mr. Wong's calculations inaccurate, and the correct calculations were nowhere near what he theorized. it actually caused some major debate on the stardestroyer.net forums, where Wong actually replied to some of my comments but basically just insulted my intelligence on the matter.

anyways, after saying that, i would say that SW would beat ST in some aspects, but ST would win in others. for example, im sure some Star Destroyers could take out Federation ships, but then again i think the Borg could take out the Death Star. it's all a matter of what you are comparing.
Now, are Wong's calculations correct? Aside from Wong, what other sources concur with him?

I am asking him on the sources and whatnot of this stuff he is saying.

But the point still remains: Are Wong's calcs accurate? Does any official cannon guide book concur with him to some degree?

No flames plz....
Who said this? I imagine that some people actually have brought up reasonable points, but it is VERY rare to see Mike's work criticized, which is a testament to its accuracy and integrity.

Edit: Incidentally, remember that a LOT of people will brag about how they shot down Mike Wong's work, etc. etc. etc. Almost no one has done it. From his claim that Mike didn't really answer his points, and mostly flamed him, I would assume this was a standard issue Trek-troll, and that his statements can be dismissed as the ravings of a madman.
Last edited by Master of Ossus on 2003-05-21 07:42pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

Solauren wrote:From my understanding, the Star Wars incredible cross sections books are on the same level as the movies, where in they are the guides to the events and technologies shown. They don't contradict anything, they explain it in clear english.
That would make them official (as in, lower than the films, novelizations, radio dramas and scripts, which are all forms of canon).
(I only have the cross section book from the first movie/trilogy. Mind you the Death Star cross section is cool. THe reactor is like 10 miles in diameter!)
Good for you.
Anyway, please point out to the poster Darth Wong's calculations are low end and are supported as low end by these books. The primary guns on a "20 year old" Assault Ship (compared to an ISD) are 200 GIGATONS each. Depending on your calculation method, that's 500 TW (1 ft/ton = 2711.64 watts, 200 Gigatons = 200,000,000,000 tons. 200,000,000,000 tons = 542328000000000 watts or 542.328 Terrawatts) or higher.
Okay, first of all, Gigaton is a measure of energy. It's a substantial amount of energy, for our purposes. You cannot directly convert energy into power (watts) without knowing the length of time over which the energy is being used/released. You need a time frame, which is about 1/15 of one second in SW turbolasers. Finally, an Acclamator is not an assault ship, but a mere troop transport.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10301
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Post by Solauren »

Actually, according to Starwars.com, and most of the sources out there I have read, both offical and unoffical, its called a "Republic Assault Ship"

*shrugs*

Off course, that's nit picking. It can carry 15,000 troopers, support equippment, and perform a BDZ on a target planet. I'll call it whatever the hell the captain of it wants me too

Oh, thanks for reminding me about the time point with watts/joules. I need to take that into consideration next time
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

Solauren wrote: and perform a BDZ on a target planet. I'll call it whatever the hell the captain of it wants me too
It doesn't appear to be able to BDZ a planet by itself. The ICS refers to groups of them being able to do so, but its actual firepower (and, therefore, ability to destroy a planet using a BDZ), appears to be limited by either the maintenance required by the weapons, fuel, etc.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10301
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Post by Solauren »

Actually, all the offical source material says the Acclamator's where the first ship in the star wars galaxy to be able to perform a BDZ
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Master of Ossus wrote:
Solauren wrote: and perform a BDZ on a target planet. I'll call it whatever the hell the captain of it wants me too
It doesn't appear to be able to BDZ a planet by itself. The ICS refers to groups of them being able to do so, but its actual firepower (and, therefore, ability to destroy a planet using a BDZ), appears to be limited by either the maintenance required by the weapons, fuel, etc.
Actually, a single one can throw down enough energy to do it in one hour. I would assume the need for multiple Acclamators would be the second part: No one escapes. An Acclamator does not carry any fighters like later ships do, which means that anyone who gets off the ground can run for it. I would assume the others are there just to prevent anyone from running to hyperspace.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Solauren wrote:Actually, all the offical source material says the Acclamator's where the first ship in the star wars galaxy to be able to perform a BDZ
IIRC, they say that the Clone Wars were when a BDZ was first preformed, not that Acclamators were the first ships to preform it. Because any group of ships can preform one. It would take 3 dreadnaughts to do it, the same number of Acclamators it takes.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
Post Reply