What desktop res do you use and think is the best?

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

Well?

640x480
0
No votes
800x600
2
6%
1024x768
12
39%
1152x864
4
13%
1280x960 or 1280x1024
12
39%
1600x1200
1
3%
1400x1050
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
Shinova
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10193
Joined: 2002-10-03 08:53pm
Location: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

What desktop res do you use and think is the best?

Post by Shinova »

I've always used 800x600, but just now I'm gonna try to get myself acquainted with 1024x768.

This thread clearly needs a poll! - Phong
What's her bust size!?

It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Warspite
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1970
Joined: 2002-11-10 11:28am
Location: Somewhere under a rock

Post by Warspite »

I use 800x600 and 1024x768, big resolutions are good for small screens, since you can have a larger workspace, but its terrible on the eyes.
[img=left]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/ ... iggado.jpg[/img] "You know, it's odd; practically everything that's happened on any of the inhabited planets has happened on Terra before the first spaceship." -- Space Viking
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

800x600, and it shows more space then I need
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

1024x768
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Dillon
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 1017
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:00am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by Dillon »

1280x1024 on a 17" monitor.
User avatar
Hamel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3842
Joined: 2003-02-06 10:34am
Contact:

Post by Hamel »

1280x960

I would go higher, but my monitor is blurry
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22652
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Post by Dalton »

1024x768. I'd use 1280x1024 if I had a bigger monitor.
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

1024x768 on a 17"
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Ravencrow
Padawan Learner
Posts: 329
Joined: 2003-02-25 01:49am
Location: On a tropical island

Post by Ravencrow »

1024x768 on a 15" screen. Just right for me.
User avatar
thecreech
Smasher/Devourer
Posts: 3478
Joined: 2002-08-12 08:39pm
Location: New Mexico... and yes it is a state , Go look at a fucking map of the USA
Contact:

Post by thecreech »

observer_20000 wrote:1280x1024 on a 17" monitor.
same here.
Image
Datana
Jedi Master
Posts: 1011
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:16am
Contact:

Post by Datana »

1280x1024 on a 19" monitor. I use 1024x768 on a 17". Of course, for the first, I have to set "use large icons" to be able to quickly target and hit things on my desktop. I'd actually go higher on my 19", but the refresh rate is terrible above where I have it.
Member of the Anti-PETA Anti-Fascist League
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

1600x1200x32 on my desktop
1024x768x32 on my laptop.
namdoolb
Padawan Learner
Posts: 431
Joined: 2002-12-06 07:21pm

Post by namdoolb »

1024*768 on a 15" Flatscreen.

It will do 800*600, but because it's Flatscreen it doesn't get as good definition when working at lower res than the intended.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

On LCDs, you have to use integer divisions of the size to get a clean image (e.g. 800x600 <-> 1600x1200).

Flatscreens are not merely limited to LCDs; many CRTs are also flatscreens.
User avatar
Pu-239
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4727
Joined: 2002-10-21 08:44am
Location: Fake Virginia

Post by Pu-239 »

1280x1024 at 60Hz on a 17 incher. Which means if you look out the edge of your eye, you can see it flickering. But my eyes are already f*cked up.

ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer


George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
User avatar
Damaramu
Jedi Master
Posts: 1449
Joined: 2002-07-06 04:09am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Damaramu »

1152x864
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

I run at 1280x1024 on my 19 inch at home and 1024x768 on my work box.

Just a quick note, you should not be running 1280x1024 on anything but a 19" monitor, as that resolution was designed for 19" monitors. If you'll notice, it does not have a 4:3 aspect ratio because a 19" monitor has slightly different dimensions. If you run 1280x960 on a 19 inch monitor, circles will appear disproportionate. And running 1280x1024 on a 17" monitor will kill your eyes. :)
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
BrYaN19kc
Jedi Knight
Posts: 682
Joined: 2002-11-19 10:14pm

Post by BrYaN19kc »

1152x864 on a 21" viewable. 8)

I had to edit this after I checked my resolution. It's kind of a weird setting, but it works great on this monitor.
Image
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

BrYaN19kc wrote:1152x864 on a 21" viewable. 8)

I had to edit this after I checked my resolution. It's kind of a weird setting, but it works great on this monitor.
Feh, it's hardly a strange resolution. I like using 1152x864. And it's just fantastic on my mere 17" monitor.
User avatar
Graeme Dice
Jedi Master
Posts: 1344
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:10am
Location: Edmonton

Post by Graeme Dice »

1024X768 on a 15" monitor. I have too many icons on my desktop to use smaller resolutions now.
"I have also a paper afloat, with an electromagnetic theory of light, which, till I am convinced to the contrary, I hold to be great guns."
-- James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) Scottish physicist. In a letter to C. H. Cay, 5 January 1865.
Companion Cube
Biozeminade!
Posts: 3874
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:29pm
Location: what did you doooooo щ(゚Д゚щ)

Post by Companion Cube »

1280x1024. And fairly uncluttered as well...
And when I'm sad, you're a clown
And if I get scared, you're always a clown
Thunderfire
Jedi Master
Posts: 1063
Joined: 2002-08-13 04:52am

Post by Thunderfire »

1280x1024 on a 17.4 inch LCD
1024x768 on a 15 inch LCD
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

800x600 with a 14" or 15"
1024x768 if 17"
1280x960 on my current 19"

Anything more than that and it's a strain for the eyes.
But for games, I rarely go over 1024x768 (sometimes I use less, really think it's silly to use more). Only when I can have more space with the interface (windows in Morrowind, etc, which I play at 1280x960).
Image
User avatar
Hethrir
Jedi Master
Posts: 1095
Joined: 2003-03-25 05:37am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by Hethrir »

GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:Feh, it's hardly a strange resolution. I like using 1152x864. And it's just fantastic on my mere 17" monitor.
Seconded
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Durandal wrote:I run at 1280x1024 on my 19 inch at home and 1024x768 on my work box.

Just a quick note, you should not be running 1280x1024 on anything but a 19" monitor, as that resolution was designed for 19" monitors. If you'll notice, it does not have a 4:3 aspect ratio because a 19" monitor has slightly different dimensions. If you run 1280x960 on a 19 inch monitor, circles will appear disproportionate. And running 1280x1024 on a 17" monitor will kill your eyes. :)
Our 19" monitors are 4:3, I don't know what you're running :P
Post Reply