Page 1 of 1
Nice kitbash model
Posted: 2003-07-14 10:09pm
by Montcalm
I don`t know if you saw this site,but he has some nice kitbashes.
STK
I like this one best
Posted: 2003-07-15 12:19am
by Drooling Iguana
That site really puts into perspective how much better looking the TOS movie-era Starfleet ships were compared to the TNG-onward designs.
Posted: 2003-07-15 12:21am
by kojikun
this is a very nice one, reminds me of the constellation which i LOVE
http://members.fortunecity.com/jpayne/t ... _lion.html
this is a really good use of the Galaxy class saucer
http://members.fortunecity.com/jpayne/t ... iance.html
Posted: 2003-07-15 04:22pm
by apocolypse
Some of them are pretty cool, but the quad nacelle thing bugs me. It was okay on Stargazer, but not on the Galaxy bash.
Not bad!
Posted: 2003-07-15 04:59pm
by BenRG
There are some interesting ships there, although I agree that the nacalle configuration of some of the 4-nacelle is just plain ugly.
Still, that USS Wolf (NX-75984) is interesteing. Methinks that someone is either a fan of the ST-TOS graphic novel 'Debt of Honour' or is a WCIII fan.
My favorite is the USS Peregrine. I actually think that it is logical the the Federation might have tried to create a directly reverse-engineered copy of the Romulan BoP in the belief that it had certain stealth or performance characteristics that gave it an advantage in covert ops.
Posted: 2003-07-16 02:53am
by TurboPhaser
Whoa! That first one is gorgeous!
If Starfleet builds a ISD rival, thats what it should look like. Retro, but with a serious 'dont f**k with me' look.
Posted: 2003-07-16 04:25am
by El Moose Monstero
Looks very piscine, if that's the word I'm looking for, I quite liked a couple of bits and pieces on the Excelsior variants, namely the saucer-stardrive linking sections, but the rest of the excelsior hulls were pretty awful.
And I do like the saucer and hull on that diplomatic cruiser, but the nacelles have no need of being there, two would have worked, or even four if they were on an ordinary angle.
Posted: 2003-07-16 12:22pm
by Master of Ossus
The_Lumberjack wrote:Looks very piscine, if that's the word I'm looking for,
I don't think that's quite the word you were looking for. Piscine is the adjective for "fish like."
I quite liked a couple of bits and pieces on the Excelsior variants, namely the saucer-stardrive linking sections, but the rest of the excelsior hulls were pretty awful.
I thought some of the designs were cool, but a few of them missed.
And I do like the saucer and hull on that diplomatic cruiser, but the nacelles have no need of being there, two would have worked, or even four if they were on an ordinary angle.
I agree. I didn't much care for the destroyer, either, or the "Edmund Fitzgeral" class.
Posted: 2003-07-16 01:35pm
by Frank Hipper
Rodenbery supposedly stated that nacelles must always come in pairs, with at least 50% of their surface in direct line-of-sight with each other.
While noone involved with Voyager had much interest in continuity, that would explain why the nacelles had to swing up for warp flight.
But it sure in the HELL doesn't explain why they had to pivot down to the horizontal in the first place!
Really dig the pre-TOS model, BTW. That site isn't your average kitbash horror fest.

Posted: 2003-07-16 01:52pm
by El Moose Monstero
I think piscine was the word I was looking for actually, maybe its just the secondary hull and the camera angle, but I get a strong fishy vibe from it, now I think about it, it looks a little like a Dauntless Cruiser from SW:Supremacy but with Star Trek bits on it.