Steve Irwin Says: John Howard World's Greatest Leader

HemlockGrey · Post by **HemlockGrey** » 2003-10-02 09:15pm

FDR and Churchill roll in grave! Lincoln and Washington flabbergasted! Caesar and Bismark astonished; Ivan the Great vows to 'bury him'.

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-10-02 09:17pm

You're going to take the word of a guy who routinely chases down the world's most dangerous animals and almost kisses them at the same time as letting them maul him?

Post by **weemadando** » 2003-10-02 09:24pm

STEVE IRWIN MUST DIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEE!

*CALLS FORTH THE HORDES OF IRATE AUSTRALIANS*

DIE STEVE IRWIN!

DIE A HORRIBLE DEATH!

YOU UN-AUSTRALIAN SELL-OUT!

YOU GODDAMN YANKEE ARSE KISSER!

DIE A THOUSAND DEATHS!

WHORE OF THE US PUBLIC!

SCUM!

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2003-10-02 09:24pm

weemadando wrote:STEVE IRWIN MUST DIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEE!

*CALLS FORTH THE HORDES OF IRATE AUSTRALIANS*

DIE STEVE IRWIN!

DIE A HORRIBLE DEATH!

YOU UN-AUSTRALIAN SELL-OUT!

YOU GODDAMN YANKEE ARSE KISSER!

DIE A THOUSAND DEATHS!

WHORE OF THE US PUBLIC!

SCUM!

You're not Steve Irwin?

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-10-02 09:25pm

I thought Aussies loved him. Don't you ove him, Ando?

What about Crocodile Dundee or Skippy?

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-10-02 09:31pm

Weemadando you don`t have to get angry over what SI said,i`m sure if Canada`s Prime-Minister Jean Cretin had visited his zoo he would have said the same thing.

Post by **weemadando** » 2003-10-02 09:43pm

Admiral Valdemar wrote:I thought Aussies loved him. Don't you ove him, Ando?

What about Crocodile Dundee or Skippy?

Crocodile Dundee is amusing if grossly misleading.

Skippy is just plain shit. To quote on of the lead actors from the series when asked about it: "I couldn't give a flying fuck about a goddamn talking kangaroo."

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-10-02 10:28pm

Well, if the Australians hate him, then maybe that's why he likes Howard: He hasn't kicked him out of the country.

Typhonis 1 · Post by **Typhonis 1** » 2003-10-03 01:27am

hmmm Jurasic Park 4 SI goes to the island tris to shove his thumb up a Rexs rectum gets his head bit off

pellaeons_scion · Post by **pellaeons_scion** » 2003-10-03 02:14am

*flabbergasted*

Does the mans stupidity no no bounds?? Howard??? That cretinous, self serving, egotisitical prat!!! He who blindly follows what ever orders the US gives? With his party full of economic hatchetmen...and he calls this greatness?!

I say we burn Howard, and use assholes like Steve Irwin as kindling (if only for the fact he perpetuates the myth of aussies being bronzed crocodile wrestling psychopaths)

Count me in Ando, when does the attack commence...

Glocksman · Post by **Glocksman** » 2003-10-03 03:17am

Isn't Howard the one that rounded up the illegal immigrants and asylum seekers and put them in camps pending hearing their asylum claims or deportation?

Hell, we should elect him President of the US if he'd do the same thing and deport all of our illegal immigrants and use the US military to patrol the Mexican border. The Canadian border doesn't need to be patrolled because we don't have 7 million Canadians here illegally.

John Howard for President.

Post by **Vympel** » 2003-10-03 08:13am

We fucking hate Steve Irwin. National Embarassment.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2003-10-03 08:20am

I saw a picture of the Irwin after the event, and he appeared to have either chocolate on his nose or some other brown substance.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2003-10-03 08:24am

Glocksman wrote:Isn't Howard the one that rounded up the illegal immigrants and asylum seekers and put them in camps pending hearing their asylum claims or deportation?

Hell, we should elect him President of the US if he'd do the same thing and deport all of our illegal immigrants and use the US military to patrol the Mexican border. The Canadian border doesn't need to be patrolled because we don't have 7 million Canadians here illegally.

John Howard for President.

Thats fine, just make sure you have a foreign leader do his thinking for him..preferably while said foreign leader has his dick in his ass..little johny likes it best that way..

Post by **Gandalf** » 2003-10-03 08:32am

"We need guns, lots of guns."

Col. Crackpot · Post by **Col. Crackpot** » 2003-10-03 08:33am

Stuart Mackey wrote:
Glocksman wrote:Isn't Howard the one that rounded up the illegal immigrants and asylum seekers and put them in camps pending hearing their asylum claims or deportation?

Hell, we should elect him President of the US if he'd do the same thing and deport all of our illegal immigrants and use the US military to patrol the Mexican border. The Canadian border doesn't need to be patrolled because we don't have 7 million Canadians here illegally.

John Howard for President.
Thats fine, just make sure you have a foreign leader do his thinking for him..preferably while said foreign leader has his dick in his ass..little johny likes it best that way..

Didn't your PM mothball your entire air force?

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2003-10-03 08:52am

Col. Crackpot wrote:
Stuart Mackey wrote:
Glocksman wrote:Isn't Howard the one that rounded up the illegal immigrants and asylum seekers and put them in camps pending hearing their asylum claims or deportation?

Hell, we should elect him President of the US if he'd do the same thing and deport all of our illegal immigrants and use the US military to patrol the Mexican border. The Canadian border doesn't need to be patrolled because we don't have 7 million Canadians here illegally.

John Howard for President.
Thats fine, just make sure you have a foreign leader do his thinking for him..preferably while said foreign leader has his dick in his ass..little johny likes it best that way..
Didn't your PM mothball your entire air force?

no

Col. Crackpot · Post by **Col. Crackpot** » 2003-10-03 08:53am

Stuart Mackey wrote:
Col. Crackpot wrote:
Stuart Mackey wrote: Thats fine, just make sure you have a foreign leader do his thinking for him..preferably while said foreign leader has his dick in his ass..little johny likes it best that way..
Didn't your PM mothball your entire air force?
no

i distinctly remember hearing that Helen Clark mothballed every fighter in the NZ Air Force.

Post by **Vympel** » 2003-10-03 08:58am

New Zealand doesn't need an air force. A handful of A-4s will do precisely jack shit in any situation NZ could possibly find itself in. At best it could get by with some light attack helicopters. That's it.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2003-10-03 09:10am

Col. Crackpot wrote:
i distinctly remember hearing that Helen Clark mothballed every fighter in the NZ Air Force.

The government desided to not replace the A4 squadrons. No NZ government can scrap an entire arm of the armed forces, its unconstitional.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2003-10-03 09:15am

Vympel wrote:New Zealand doesn't need an air force. A handful of A-4s will do precisely jack shit in any situation NZ could possibly find itself in. At best it could get by with some light attack helicopters. That's it.

Our A4's formed the best maritime strike units in the asia pacific area and would have been usefull in a scrap with Indonesia/or other nation, but not in a strictly homedefence role. But we would have had to increace the overall size of the airforce at the same time.

We will not get attack choppers for the same reasons we did not get the F16's that were offered to us. They looked at attack choppers and found them to be far too inflexable, needed a huge logistics tail, and cost way to much to use.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2003-10-03 09:17am

Stuart Mackey wrote:
Vympel wrote:New Zealand doesn't need an air force. A handful of A-4s will do precisely jack shit in any situation NZ could possibly find itself in. At best it could get by with some light attack helicopters. That's it.
Our A4's formed the best maritime strike units in the asia pacific area and would have been usefull in a scrap with Indonesia/or other nation, but not in a strictly home defence role. But we would have had to increase the overall size of the airforce at the same time, in any potential scrap.

We will not get attack choppers for the same reasons we did not get the F16's that were offered to us. They looked at attack choppers and also found them to be far too inflexable, needed a huge logistics tail, and cost way to much to use.

*edited version above* I hate the lack of edit button.

Post by **Vympel** » 2003-10-03 10:35am

[Aussie]The RAAF's F/A-18A/Bs are superior maritime strike units to the NZAF A-4Ks, before the HUG with the superior AN/APG-65 radar, and especially now- the last HUG aircraft was delivered just two months ago, with AN/APG-73 radar.[/Aussie] Besides, even Indonesia has F-16s, which I'd bet on over an A-4K any day of the week- now that Indonesia is taking possession of Su-27s and Su-30s, NZAFs A-4Ks would just be looking embarassing- without a new aircraft, they really were a waste of resources- not to mention, how long could they be kept flying?

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2003-10-03 10:44pm

Vympel wrote:[Aussie]The RAAF's F/A-18A/Bs are superior maritime strike units to the NZAF A-4Ks, before the HUG with the superior AN/APG-65 radar, and especially now- the last HUG aircraft was delivered just two months ago, with AN/APG-73 radar.[/Aussie]

We had F16 A/B avionics and much better pilots..and we still have a better rugby team than Aussie.

Besides, even Indonesia has F-16s, which I'd bet on over an A-4K any day of the week- now that Indonesia is taking possession of Su-27s and Su-30s, NZAFs A-4Ks would just be looking embarassing- without a new aircraft, they really were a waste of resources- not to mention, how long could they be kept flying?

When the A4K's were retired they were 'getting on' as it were. We never pretended that our planes could take on Indonesian F16s in a real fight, which is why were were so good as CAS and maritime strike, we had no intenion of fighting anyone's planes. However we do know that we had far superior pilots than them, as during exersises we could hold our own in dogfighting, sometimes.
The A4 fleet could have been kept flying for another 4 or 5 years befor things got to the point where even we could not keep them flying.

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2003-10-03 10:51pm

Glocksman wrote:Isn't Howard the one that rounded up the illegal immigrants and asylum seekers and put them in camps pending hearing their asylum claims or deportation?

There was also some big scuffle involving a ship full of refugees, as I recall.

Hell, we should elect him President of the US if he'd do the same thing and deport all of our illegal immigrants and use the US military to patrol the Mexican border. The Canadian border doesn't need to be patrolled because we don't have 7 million Canadians here illegally.

Of course not, because we're happy at home. I've seen pictures of life in Mexico; if you lived there, you'd want to get out too