Big Media Gets Bigger

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Tsyroc
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13748
Joined: 2002-07-29 08:35am
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Big Media Gets Bigger

Post by Tsyroc »

Don't you just love how all the rules meant to prevent monopolies in the U.S. are just conveniently ignored whenever big money is involved? Wouldn't want to "hurt the economy" by upholding the law. It's not just the media but the media is one of the worst since so many people get their information from TV and radio.

Bill Moyers on Salon.com wrote:When big media gets bigger
Bill Moyers: "The effort to reverse the FCC is dead in the water, sinking the democratic process with it."

Editor's note: Bill Moyers, former special assistant to President Lyndon Johnson, is the host of PBS' "NOW with Bill Moyers." Below is the full text of his commentary for PBS Friday on media deregulation.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Bill Moyers

Oct. 10, 2003 | Big Media companies keep getting bigger -- with more and more power over our lives. This week's deal between General Electric (GE) and Vivendi means that GE'S NBC, which helped elect Arnold Schwarzenegger governor of California, has just picked up not only Universal Studios, but the USA, Trio and Sci-fi cable channels to go with CNBC and MSNBC, all part now of a $43 billion empire.

Then, there's radio. The nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity is out with a new study showing that in each of 43 different cities a third of the radio stations are owned by a single company. No company's supposed to own more than eight in any market, but the media giants thumb their nose at the rules all the time. In 34 of those 43 markets, one company owns more than eight stations.

The big daddy of all is Clear Channel Communications -- 1,200 stations altogether. In Mansfield, Ohio, Clear Channel owns 11 of the 17 radio stations in your town. In Corvallis, Ore., over half of what people hear is decided by Clear Channel -- seven of 13 radio stations.

Cumulus Media is the second biggest radio empire. Cumulus, remember, banned the Dixie Chicks. Cumulus owns eight of the 15 radio stations in Albany, Ga.

It's a similar story in television. No single company is supposed to control more than one television station per city, except in some big markets. But look at what's happened in Wilmington, North Carolina, where there are three network affiliate stations -- Fox, NBC and ABC. This year, the Fox station changed hands. On paper, the new owner was Southeastern Media Holdings. But then Southeastern Media announced that Raycom Media would help manage the company. Raycom already owns the NBC station, so it combined the two news departments and laid off much of the staff.

But hold on to your hat -- Raycom and Southeastern Media Holdings turn out to be part of the same company. Now there's not only one less independent news operation in Wilmington, there's also one less media company.

The flimflam-ery goes on. In 33 other cities, stations that are supposed to be competitors have found clever ways to undermine the existing rules, mergers and takeovers, for example. Remember when Viacom married CBS and Rupert Murdoch's News Corp ponied up for the television stations owned by Chris-Craft? Those deals put both conglomerates in violation of the rule that no one company can control stations that reach more than 35 percent of the total audience. But so what? The FCC just rolled over, winked, and gave both conglomerates temporary waivers of the rule. A little time passed and this summer the FCC raised the limit to give the big guys what they wanted, anyway.

That giveaway brought protests from over 2 million citizens; they turned the FCC into a besieged Bastille on the Potomac. Such indignation from the grass roots caused even the Senate to say, "Whoa, something's going on. People really care about this issue." And the Senate stopped the FCC in its tracks. There are enough votes to do the same in the House. But then, General Electric, owner of NBC; News Corp, owner of Fox; Viacom, owner of CBS; and Walt Disney, owner of ABC, brought on the hired guns -- the lobbyists -- to wage a Trojan War on Congress. A passel of former insiders moved through the revolving door, Rolodex in tow, trading their influence for cash -- top aides of the Senate majority leader, the House majority whip and of John Ashcroft himself.

Now the most powerful Republican in Congress, Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, won't let a vote happen. The effort to reverse the FCC is dead in the water, sinking the democratic process with it.
How does this impact free speach when these conglomerates were able to buy their way out of trouble and now control so many of the avenues to getting ideas heard?

I don't like how the US (and the world) has been progressing towards fewer and fewer megacorporations.
By the pricking of my thumb,
Something wicked this way comes.
Open, locks,
Whoever knocks.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

They even have monopoly laws in the US?!

In the UK no single company can own 25% share of the market they're in.
User avatar
Tsyroc
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13748
Joined: 2002-07-29 08:35am
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Post by Tsyroc »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:They even have monopoly laws in the US?!

In the UK no single company can own 25% share of the market they're in.
We're supposed to. They came into effect back when Teddy Roosevelt was president (early 20th century). It's best known for breaking up Standard Oil's monopoly.

Anymore none of the anti-monopoly laws seemed to be enforced very stringenlty. There's always some "interpretation" that is used that lets them go. Basically nothing is going to happen as long as there's still some competiton, however minimal, otherwise breaking up the monopolies would be bad for business (ie: bad for stockholders). :roll:

IIRC it used to be that foreign nationals weren't supposed to be able to own US tv and radio stations, or maybe it was news agencies. Well they threw that one out for Rupert Murdoch (he may have technically become a US citizen but do we really want one guy having so much media influence throughout the world?).
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

Overzealous enfocement of those same laws (monopoly laws, not FCC rules, about which I'm largely ignorant) nearly ruined several US industries a few decades ago, which is probably why they're not being enforced very hard now.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Hamel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3842
Joined: 2003-02-06 10:34am
Contact:

Post by Hamel »

RedImperator wrote:Overzealous enfocement of those same laws (monopoly laws, not FCC rules, about which I'm largely ignorant) nearly ruined several US industries a few decades ago, which is probably why they're not being enforced very hard now.
Which industries? Was IT one of them?

*slaps own face to stay awake*
"Right now we can tell you a report was filed by the family of a 12 year old boy yesterday afternoon alleging Mr. Michael Jackson of criminal activity. A search warrant has been filed and that search is currently taking place. Mr. Jackson has not been charged with any crime. We cannot specifically address the content of the police report as it is confidential information at the present time, however, we can confirm that Mr. Jackson forced the boy to listen to the Howard Stern show and watch the movie Private Parts over and over again."
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

Hamel wrote:
RedImperator wrote:Overzealous enfocement of those same laws (monopoly laws, not FCC rules, about which I'm largely ignorant) nearly ruined several US industries a few decades ago, which is probably why they're not being enforced very hard now.
Which industries? Was IT one of them?

*slaps own face to stay awake*
The railroads come to mind, though there was a lot more than monopoly laws involved in that clusterfuck (among other things, after they switched to diesel, the railroads were still required to have a fireman ride in the cab).
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
Post Reply