9/11 panel says Iraq rebuffed Bin Laden

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Supreme_Warlord
Youngling
Posts: 149
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:04pm
Location: East Ham, London, United Kingdom, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Universe

9/11 panel says Iraq rebuffed Bin Laden

Post by Supreme_Warlord »

From here
Wednesday June 16, 2004 3:46 PM

By HOPE YEN

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Bluntly contradicting the Bush administration, the commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks reported Wednesday there was "no credible evidence'' that Saddam Hussein helped al-Qaida target the United States.

In a chilling report that sketched the history of Osama bin Laden's network, the commission said his far-flung training camps were "apparently quite good.'' Terrorist trainees were encouraged to "think creatively about ways to commit mass murder,'' it added.

Bin Laden made overtures to Saddam for assistance, the commission said in a staff report, as he did with leaders in Sudan, Iran, Afghanistan and elsewhere as he sought to build an Islamic army.

While Saddam dispatched a senior Iraqi intelligence official to Sudan to meet with bin Laden in 1994, the commission said it had not turned up evidence of a "collaborative relationship.''

The Bush administration has long claimed links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, and cited them as one reason for last year's invasion of Iraq.

On Monday, Vice President Dick Cheney said in a speech that the Iraqi dictator "had long established ties with al-Qaida.''
Emphases mine.

Well isn't that a surpise? Who wants to bet that the Bushies will still claim a link? I suppose they think that if you tell a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, no explanation will suffice.

Men don't follow titles, they follow courage!
________________________________________

100th post on Wed, 28 Apr, 2004 15:23
Post Reply