Beat HL in 45min
Posted: 2004-07-27 05:53am
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Yeah, it really ratcheted up the tension for me, especially the part where you finally get to the pipe that brings you out... and a headcrab suddenly jumps on you. First time through, I backpedaled right off the cliff.fgalkin wrote:Really? I thought it was the best part.
I don't think he cheated. The ammo count only changes at load zones, which he edited out.Alyeska wrote:The movie isn't real. Watch the guys ammo count. Its not consistent. He cheated.
Why would the ammo count change, though?Robert Treder wrote:I don't think he cheated. The ammo count only changes at load zones, which he edited out.
But that wouldn't change the ammo... each reload would start back at the save point, with the same ammo.Robert Treder wrote:Maybe it wasn't recorded in one sitting, but instead it's pieced together from multiple trials. He probably stopped to do a save at each load point, just in case.
I'm still downloading the video.. maybe he reloaded his weapon immediately after the loading zone and edited it out? (Though that would mean he was editing time out, making his actual run-through a little longer than advertised; assuming reloads don't count.)Anyways, the ammo only ever seems to go down, not up.
This could easily be due to having reloaded the map.Alyeska wrote:At one point there is a 36 round discrepency. He has 36 spare rounds for his shotgun, then he has 0 spare rounds for his shotgun.
If the link had been to the offical host, you would have seen an explanation that participants are able to film their runs in "segments", with a .5 second penalty for each segment. The last fastest run was in 100+ segments, while this one was in 21. There is also a very detailed commentary by the person who did the run about each segment.Alyeska wrote:The movie isn't real. Watch the guys ammo count. Its not consistent. He cheated.
NO ONE EVER CLAIMED IT WAS DONE IN ONE TAKE.Alyeska wrote:Reloading is still proof that it wasn't done in a single shot.
SMB3 WAS DONE FRAME BY FRAME IN A ROM. THIS WAS NOT FAKED. NICE FALSE ANALOGY.Impressive, but not wholy accurate. Much like the SMB3 in 11 minutes video.
Claiming it was beat in 45 minutes is incorrect. Its also assumed the game was done in one setting unless otherwise stated. No one pointed this out earlier hence my statement.DPDarkPrimus wrote:NO ONE EVER CLAIMED IT WAS DONE IN ONE TAKE.Alyeska wrote:Reloading is still proof that it wasn't done in a single shot.
Depends on how you look at it. This was presented without information indicating what it was and the imediate impression is that its real. I pointed out this is false. Its not faked, but its also not real.SMB3 WAS DONE FRAME BY FRAME IN A ROM. THIS WAS NOT FAKED. NICE FALSE ANALOGY.Impressive, but not wholy accurate. Much like the SMB3 in 11 minutes video.
That's the total time from when the clock is supposed to start to the end.Alyeska wrote: Claiming it was beat in 45 minutes is incorrect.
It's pointed out quite clearly on the offical site, which I linked.Its also assumed the game was done in one setting unless otherwise stated. No one pointed this out earlier hence my statement.
What the fuck are you babbling about?This was presented without information indicating what it was and the imediate impression is that its real. I pointed out this is false. Its not faked, but its also not real.
You're the person who came in here saying "he cheated". I wasn't the one who made the grossly false analogy. I suggest you STFU if you don't like it.Now I suggest you calm down.
And how do you know I didn't enjoy the video? I just pointed out that its not exactly what it appears to be.SPOOFE wrote:Don't mind Alyeska... he wouldn't know how to enjoy something if a dozen Playboy Playmates bussed in to his house.