Globalsecurity gives the muzzle velocity of the Raufoss round as about 3000 fps. So my question is: how does the incendiary in the tip accelerate the penetrator by an extra 1000 fps on impact? What does it mean to 'form adiabatic pressure'?Upon hitting an armored target, that incendiary mix will form adiabatic pressure, that pressure needing to be released will propel the 7.62mm tungsten-carbide penetrator forward at over 4000 feet per second, providing armour-piercing effect on a lightly armoured target.
Confusion on how the .50 HEIAP Raufoss round works
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Winston Blake
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: 2004-03-26 01:58am
- Location: Australia
Confusion on how the .50 HEIAP Raufoss round works
Here there is a video (three sizes) about the M82 and its various ammunition. There's one part i don't understand, where the instructor says:
Robert Gilruth to Max Faget on the Apollo program: “Max, we’re going to go back there one day, and when we do, they’re going to find out how tough it is.”
Re: Confusion on how the .50 HEIAP Raufoss round works
Easy: It doesn't. (In fact, an increase in pressure at the tip of the round can only result in it slowing down, rather than speeding up...)Winston Blake wrote:So my question is: how does the incendiary in the tip accelerate the penetrator by an extra 1000 fps on impact?
The instructor was, apparently, mistaken.
"Adiabatic" refers to a change in pressure, and means that no heat is transferred; it's basically the opposite of "isothermic" (meaning that exactly as much heat is transferred as needed to maintain constant temperature).What does it mean to 'form adiabatic pressure'?
"Forming adiabatic pressure" is a not quite correct way of saying "pressure is increased, resulting in an increase in temperature".
Putting 2+2 together, we get 5: The adiabatic pressure increase provides incendiary performance against lightly armored targets (increasing the temperature of the incendiary compound high enough to ignite it), not AP performance.
- Winston Blake
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: 2004-03-26 01:58am
- Location: Australia
Thanks, i figured the instructor was a reliable source since the video looked official. Here i was wondering about some wacky boost effect and it was just stupid fuseless detonation.
Robert Gilruth to Max Faget on the Apollo program: “Max, we’re going to go back there one day, and when we do, they’re going to find out how tough it is.”