Page 1 of 2

Star Wars Starship Battles

Posted: 2006-12-12 01:15am
by Hotfoot
Well, I stayed away from the collectable minis game from WotC because, well, frankly, tactical battles with Chewie and Luke just aren't really my cup of tea. I'll admit I wouldn't mind doing Hoth (especially with those massive AT-AT's lumbering about, damn), but that I can do for "free" at a convention because some other poor schmuck shelled out ~$400 for all the pieces needed.

However, over the weekend, this sweetness caught my eye. Yes, that's a roughly six inch miniature SSD and big-ass calamari ship. I'd buy the starter set for the Executor alone, but the rest of it intrigues me. While there are some stupid things (like naboo fighters, ugh) the entire game fascinates me. I'll admit, I'm a sucker for starship combat games, and, well, STAR WARS. The models look quite nice, has anyone else tried this, or even seen it?

Image

Posted: 2006-12-12 01:29am
by Vympel
The SW canon side of it has been discussed extensively on PSW, so yeah, we're aware of it :)

I might get them as well.

Posted: 2006-12-12 03:17am
by Ritterin Sophia
I buy minis for one reason, and that reason is for them to be used in conjunction with the Star Wars RPG. So... yeah, I'm gettin' it.

Posted: 2006-12-12 10:38am
by 000
I heard (via Ender, I think) that the prequel minis, at least, are molded using the 3-D models made for the movies. The VenStar & Recusant, at least, look incredibly like their movie counterparts.

I'll be getting a chance to check this all out come Christmas (bought it as a gift for a relative), and I'm looking forward to it.

Oh yeah, and: 17 km Viscount. Still in awe of that decision.

Posted: 2006-12-12 10:39am
by MKSheppard
the minis aren't scaled right. Why is the mon cal ship that comes with the starter the same lenght as the executor?

Posted: 2006-12-12 10:46am
by InnocentBystander
Symmetry? aesthetics?

The game does seem cool, but it sure smells like a CCG style money-sink.

Posted: 2006-12-12 10:52am
by Stark
I dunno: the starter thing is both cheap and actually worth something ingame, unlike CCGs. If the Executor model wasn't wrong I'd buy it. :)

Posted: 2006-12-12 11:06am
by 000
Shep: She's far more massive than regular Mon Cal vessels-- 17 km, like I said.

Anyway, it'd be impossible to scale everything properly, so... I don't think they even bothered.

Posted: 2006-12-12 11:26am
by MKSheppard
What the fuck? Who decided to give the rebels an equivalent to the Executor?!!?!?!?

*shep is getting shades of bullshit made up vessels so both sides are 'balanced', ala Rebellion*

Don't these idiots understand that the Rebellion CANT afford the huge death ships that the empire can?

Posted: 2006-12-12 11:28am
by 000
The Rebels can't, but the New Republic can. Viscount was ordered seventeen years after Yavin and commissioned about eight years after that.

Posted: 2006-12-12 11:28am
by Stark
Hey, at least it isn't the converted luxury cruiser ship Executor-equivalent from Rebellion. :)

Posted: 2006-12-12 12:17pm
by Edward Yee
To be fair, when it comes to things like this, I tend to say that house rules will suffice to fix the issue.

Posted: 2006-12-12 07:54pm
by NRS Guardian
Yes, the Viscount is found in the NJO. The NR put out an Executor equivalent 21 years after Endor that isn't bullshit, it's common sense.

Posted: 2006-12-13 12:27am
by RogueIce
Stark wrote:Hey, at least it isn't the converted luxury cruiser ship Executor-equivalent from Rebellion. :)
Technically, the Dauntless is an ISDII equivalent. The Bulwark (an ugly POS) is supposed to have always been a dedicated combat vessel...if retarded looking.

Posted: 2006-12-13 03:54am
by InnocentBystander
Stark wrote:Hey, at least it isn't the converted luxury cruiser ship Executor-equivalent from Rebellion. :)
Because, of course, the Rebellion has never been known to convert luxury liners into military vessels with any success . . .

Posted: 2006-12-13 04:24am
by Stark
RogueIce wrote:Technically, the Dauntless is an ISDII equivalent. The Bulwark (an ugly POS) is supposed to have always been a dedicated combat vessel...if retarded looking.
Really? Eh, I haven't seen the Rebellion manual in years. I just remember my shock at 'wtf the rebels can build a ship better than Executor'. :)
IB wrote:Because, of course, the Rebellion has never been known to convert luxury liners into military vessels with any success . . .
It's still STUPID. Indeed, I thought the MonCal ships being 'converted civilian ships' and 'unique works of art' had ended up on the scraphead of lame EU concepts ages ago. Just like 'roffle teh rebs have redundant shields a huge advantage the Imperials never though of lol they don't even shield fighters!11'. :)

Posted: 2006-12-13 11:41am
by 000
The Bulwark from Rebellion was an an updated version of a Clone War CIS vessel that was only 1000 meters long-- Dan Wallace suggested the Rebellion one was a mark IV and somewhat larger, although having it as an Executor-equivalent was mostly just game mechanics.

As for MonCal liners-to-combat-warships: recent Clone War era literature nixed that idea, which is now best explained as Rebel propaganda.

Posted: 2006-12-13 11:51am
by Ace Pace
Looks neat, if for nothing else as replacement for the ship sets in Twilight Imperium III. :wink:

Posted: 2006-12-13 04:12pm
by RogueIce
Stark wrote:
RogueIce wrote:Technically, the Dauntless is an ISDII equivalent. The Bulwark (an ugly POS) is supposed to have always been a dedicated combat vessel...if retarded looking.
Really? Eh, I haven't seen the Rebellion manual in years. I just remember my shock at 'wtf the rebels can build a ship better than Executor'. :)
IIRC, The SSD will beat a Bulwark in a straight fight (unless you throw in fighters), game-wise at least.
000 wrote:The Bulwark from Rebellion was an an updated version of a Clone War CIS vessel that was only 1000 meters long-- Dan Wallace suggested the Rebellion one was a mark IV and somewhat larger, although having it as an Executor-equivalent was mostly just game mechanics.
I have no problem with a New Republic SSD-equivalent. It makes sense that they'd eventually figure it out. But the way it was presented in SW Rebellion just looked retarded.

However, I saw a pic of it from EaW and it looks a little better at least. So maybe there is some hope for it yet.

Posted: 2006-12-13 04:18pm
by 000
The Bulwark-class wasn't in EaW...

It also, given newer information, probably wasn't in Executor's size class. At most its tonnage might have put it on a par with pocket SSDs like Allegiance, but given that the original was only 1000 meters in length, probably not.

Posted: 2006-12-13 05:00pm
by Stark
Wow, really? So they just grabbed some EU ship and wanked it out to Executor level for game mechanics? Weak. :)

Posted: 2006-12-13 05:02pm
by 000
No, they took the ship from Rebellion and deflated it to VSD-size. ;)

Equally weak, though.

Posted: 2006-12-13 06:04pm
by RogueIce
000 wrote:The Bulwark-class wasn't in EaW...
Then I have been lied to. Maybe it ended up in Warlords? Or a Mod of some sort? Because I did see a pic of it missile spamming.

Posted: 2006-12-13 06:22pm
by 000
It was in one of the incarnations of Warlords, so that's probably what you saw.

Posted: 2006-12-13 06:37pm
by Rawtooth
Here is a review of it at DakkaDakka.com